My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2000 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
04-12-2000 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2012 9:10:17 AM
Creation date
6/27/2012 9:03:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAYOR <br />Michael I. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Jim LaVaile <br />Steve Moreton <br />Bob Pedersen <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 ADMINISTRATOR <br />(651) 484 -2177 / FAX: (651) 484 -4538 Joel R. Hanson <br />Email: cityhall @ci.little- canada.mn.us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: April 7, 2000 <br />RE: Goose Control Contract <br />In 1999, we again participated in the goose control round -up program. However, a formal contract <br />documenting our relationship with the University of Minnesota was not received until late in 1999. <br />Therefore, to continue participation in 2001, we would need to approve the execution of this contract. <br />The proposed contract amount is $4,506 for the two -year period ($2,253 per year). This amount has been <br />partially offset by contributions from other entities interested in having the problem addressed in their <br />area. <br />Also attached to this memo is a letter dated October 18, 1999 from Dr. James Cooper that discussed the <br />1999 goose capture program. It also includes Little Canada capture rates. <br />Ms. Bonnie Chester of 303 Savage Lane is concemed about removing all geese from Savage Lake. (She <br />would like a pair of geese left on the lake.) She has asked us to look at other alternatives including <br />chemical applications (see memo from Elizabeth Mursko dated March 16, 2000). Another option would <br />be to allow egg addling which would involve shaking, oiling, puncturing, or freezing the eggs when they <br />return to the nest so that the mother goose will not lay more eggs (see attached article from the Coalition <br />to Prevent the Destruction of Canada Geese). <br />The problem I see with the chemical application is the cost of the materials in terms of product and <br />application. (Please note multiple applications are likely to be necessary.) Also, the area chemicals need <br />to be applied to in order to provide the desired control would be fairly large. Without removal, <br />populations will move from site to site and the nuisance will remain. Egg addling may be more viable, <br />but the issue is who would conduct such an operation. These may also be issues of legal authority to <br />conduct this activity. <br />It is my recommendation that we once again participate in the goose control program and authorize <br />execution of the contract as presented. Should the Council want us to pursue any other options to address <br />Ms. Chester's concern, I would ask that you please provide such direction. <br />cc: Bonnie Chester <br />\ \C LCSRVOI \l IOM E \KrisP \CORRESP \2000 \Goose Contra <br />Page 51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.