Laserfiche WebLink
Howarc R. Green Company <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />January 6, 2000 <br />File: 809320J-0240 <br />Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission <br />City of Little Canada <br />515 Little Canada Road <br />Little Canada, MN 55117 <br />RE: RICE STREET CAR WASH <br />Dear Planning Commission Members: <br />As requested, we have reviewed the submittal package for the Rice Street Car Wash site <br />development proposal. The submittal package consisted of a seven -page plan set including title <br />sheet, existing conditions, site plan, grading plan, utility plan, preliminary plat and detail sheet. <br />The submittal package was prepared by Loucks and Associates. Also submitted were exterior <br />elevations and floor plans. Based upon your review and discussions with Greg Schroeder, <br />Public Works Director we would offer the following comments: <br />A. Preliminary Site Plan <br />• The parking layout shows 22 -foot wide drive lanes with 20 -foot deep parking stalls. We <br />would suggest around the perimeter of the site where the parked vehicle has an <br />opportunity to overhang the curb that the dimensions be changed to be 18 -foot deep <br />parking stalls and 24 -foot wide isles. The 24 -foot width provides slightly more room for <br />maneuvering vehicles. <br />• Only two handicapped stalls are shown near the front of the building. We question <br />whether two are adequate for the total development and whether or not they should be <br />spread out along the front of the proposed retail space. Also a handicapped ramp will <br />need to be provided somewhere along the front sidewalk of the proposed building. <br />• Up near the northeast end of the proposed building the comer - parking stall should be <br />provided with a bump out in the curb line to facilitate backing movements out cf that stall. <br />B. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan <br />• No drainage calculations were submitted. These will need to be submitted. reviewed <br />and approved prior to final approval of the development. The proposed pond at the rear <br />of the development shows a high water level of 950. The top of the berm surrounding <br />the pond is just slightly above 950. We would suggest that at least one -foot of free <br />board be provided from the high water level to the top of the berm. Also an emergency <br />overflow should be provided somewhere near the pond outlet in case the pipe is <br />plugged. This will eliminate potential flooding of the area to the east of the pond. <br />Was the pond sized to ultimately service outlot A, if not should it be? <br />O:\PROJ\809320J \0240\Itr 1-6-00 planning comml <br />Page 75 <br />1326 Energy Park Olive • St. Paul. MN ..644 -9446 ;oll free 388/368 -4389 <br />