07-25-2012 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'!I'BJTES City Council Dec. 12, 1945 daite Guardrail (Cont.) his mail. Waite commented that the City has caused his problem by putting up the last section of guardrail. Fahey suggested that Mr. Blesener discuss with Mr. Glanzer the possibility of removing this section of rail. Blesener also reported that he will find out the history of the guardrail and report back to the Council. Scalze felt that the City would be setting a precedent by installing a guardrail to protect a mailbox. Fahey did not feel that the City has a responsibility for negligent drivers and he was not in favor of spending any more money on this. Blesenercommented that he will report hack at the next Council meeting. Klidzejs Mr. Klidzejs of Twin Lake Road appeared before the Council requesting Property approval of the division of his property into Tracts A, B, and C. Division Klidzejs reported that he has a house on Tract 3, his son has a house on Tract C and his daughter would like to build a house on Tract A. Agenda Item Ho. 7 Mr. Fahey pointed out that the Planning Commission tabled action on this matter. However, the matter was before the Planning Commission on May 5 at which time the Planning Commission recommended approval, subject to a road easement of the proper width. This carried 6 to 1. Klidzejs reported that he spoke to tors. Mitchell's son, owners of the adjoining property, and was informed that they do not wish to develop their 4.36 acres, and will sell the property to a developer sometime in the future. Klidzejs estimated that 12 lots could be developed from the Mitchell property and that access to this property would be from the road easement running alongside his property. Mr. Fahey did not feel that the City could approve the request as the lots would not have frontage on an improved street. The City Clerk reported that the City has 16.5 feet of easement for sewer on both the Mitchell property and the Klidzejs property. Mr. Klidzejs disagreed and reported that there is 20 feet of easement on the Mitchell property. Mrs. Scalze pointed out that when the Mitchell property develops, they may want access from another area. Fahey reported that City policy has been to require 50 feet of road easement dedicated to the public to approve a property division. Fahey did not feel that the Klidzejs property could he divided until the Mitchell property develops. Klidzejs reported that he has an easement to get to his house and that in the future it would be public. Page -12- 29