Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Dec. 11, 1985 <br />Klidzejs <br />Property <br />Division <br />(Cont.) <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION M0. 85 -12 -574 - APPROVING THE KLID7.EJS <br />PROPERTY DIVISION SUBJECT TO THE DEDICATION OF A <br />FULL 25 -COOT PUBLIC ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDES OF <br />TRACTS A AND 3 AND SUBJECT TO EXECUTION OF A <br />. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT TIIAT THE OWNERS OF TRACTS <br />A AND 8.WILL HOT OBJECT TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE <br />ROAD IN THE FUTURE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Scalze, Nardini, Fahey. <br />Mayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book Ho. 12, Page 623. <br />Metal Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the Buildinglnspector is concerned that <br />Buildings it is not possible to name every type of building material that could <br />be used with regard to proposed Ordinance No. 269. <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 8 Blesener felt it was not possible to write an ordinance to cover every- <br />thing. <br />Fahey agreed that the word "steel" should be added to Item 2 of the <br />ordinance. Fahey stated that if there is a problem with the ordinance, <br />the Council could look at it at that time. <br />Fahey also felt that 25% should be added to Item 3. Mr. Blesener <br />pointed out that the City has issued a building permit for Horns Tires <br />to allow this building to expand with similar materials. The expansion <br />is over 25%. <br />Fahey pointed out that this is before the ordinance. <br />Mr. Kloskin asked how this ordinance will effect his business. Blesener <br />replied that Kloskin would be allowed to expand his building up to 25% <br />of the existing structure and with similar construction. <br />Kloskin asked what would happen should he tear the building down. Fahey <br />replied that then Kloskin would have to comply with the ordinance. <br />Fahey felt that the Council should agree on an intent of the ordinance, <br />and then let the Attorney draft the ordinance. Fahey asked if the <br />intent was to allow additions of 25% of the existing building with <br />similar materials. Fahey stated that the square footage would he <br />based on the existing building on the date of the adoption of the <br />ordinance. Mr. Blesener agreed. Scalia stated that it should be <br />a maximum of 25% and a one -tine deal. <br />Page -14- <br />31 <br />