Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 <br />Keis recommended approval of the concept for the extended Bryan <br />Street to be a public street. <br />Motion seconded by Duray. <br />Motion failed 2 to 3. Keis and Duray voted in favor. Barraclough, <br />Knudsen, and Montour voted against. <br />CONCEPT The City Planner pointed out that the City had been dealing with <br />REVIEW — the issue of outdoor storage at the intersection of Edgerton Street <br />REZONING OF and County Road D relative to the Buetow property. The Council <br />BUETOW AND denied the CUP and discussed the possibility of rezoning the <br />McCUMBER property as well as the McCumber property from I -1 to another <br />PROPERTIES zoning which would be consistent with the Land Use Plan of the <br />Comprehensive Plan for this area. The Planner noted that the <br />property is surrounded by single - family residential, and the Comp <br />Plan indicates a future residential use for this property. <br />The Planner reported that the Council has asked the Planning <br />Commission to make a conceptual recommendation on the <br />rezoning of this property, taking into consideration the zonings of <br />R -I, R -2, RB, and B -1. Once a recommendation is received from <br />the Commission, the Council would start the public hearing <br />process. The City Attorney had indicated that a public hearing on <br />a rezoning should be narrowed to one possibility rather than three <br />or four potential districts. <br />Knudsen noted that the Council in denying the CUP for the <br />Buetow property is now focusing on the future use of these parcels. <br />The Planner replied that that was correct. <br />Keis stated that it was his understanding that should the parcels be <br />rezoned, the existing businesses would be allowed to continue to <br />operate. The Planner replied that that was correct. He noted that <br />once rezoned, the business would become legal non - conforming <br />uses. The businesses would not be allowed to expand, but would <br />be allowed to maintain what they have. A future buyer of the <br />property would be allowed to continue to operate as long as the <br />uses of the property are not changed. <br />Knudsen pointed out that if the buildings are destroyed by more <br />than 50 %, they would not be allowed to re- establish and the <br />properties would have to conform to the zoning. <br />Page 35 <br />