My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-1999 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
10-27-1999 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2012 11:36:05 AM
Creation date
8/24/2012 11:06:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OCTOBER 14, 1999 <br />PUD ZONING <br />IN RYAN <br />INDUSTRIAL <br />PARK <br />TIP' DISTRICT <br />NO. 3-2 <br />The Commission discussed the standards outlined in the October <br />14'" Planner's report and as recommended by the Public Works <br />Director and concurred. <br />The City Planner reported that there are a couple of properties in <br />Ryan Industrial Park that are zoned PUD. These are located on <br />the north side of Ryan Drive at Country Drive. Previously the <br />Fra -Dor property was also zoned PUD. However, that property <br />has been rezoned to provide for the recycling operation as an <br />interim use. <br />Keis pointed out that the theory with zoning these properties PUD <br />was to provide for more control at the entrance area to Ryan <br />Industrial Park. <br />The Planner pointed out that one of the differences between the <br />PUD zoning and the I -1 zoning is that chain -link fence with slats <br />cannot be used as a screening material in the PUD District. <br />The Zoning Administrator pointed out that CUP's have been <br />processed on some of the properties in Ryan Industrial Park which <br />are zoned PUD, and the PUD standards were applied for those <br />properties. <br />Keis suggested that the corner properties should be held to a higher <br />standard and recommended that the PUD zoning remain in place. <br />The Commission agreed. <br />The City Administrator asked that the Planning Commission <br />find that the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for <br />Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 and the modified Tax <br />Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 3 -2 conform to the <br />general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City. <br />The Administrator pointed out that this involves the expansion of <br />the Rice Street/Little Canada Road TIF District to include the area <br />around and including the Rice Street car wash property. The <br />Administrator reported that the redevelopment of this site meets <br />the test necessary to qualify for TIF assistance. He reported that <br />the developer will be responsible for the first $345,000 in land <br />assembly costs. 111. will offset the costs above that amount. There <br />is extensive soil corrections work necessary, and the estimate for <br />that work is $125,000. The developer will pay the first $30,000 in <br />soil corrections, with 111. assistance for the remainder. <br />PAGE 165 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.