My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1999 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-22-1999 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2012 10:52:53 AM
Creation date
8/28/2012 10:52:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2g August and City Council <br />gust 1979 <br />2 <br />Page Two <br />Zoning Code <br />applicant ' Sm atehe <br />spoken w °s contacted for use of the <br />, the following more details, building is somewhat <br />• wing uses are while not all sPace has <br />Electrical contractor's office proposed with some certainty, been <br />business c ° "t <br />and includes office this will be used • <br />Genera/ contractor's space, storage and oftr the applicant's <br />actors office abricati <br />• n9 shop. <br />Sign painter's shop, and shop. <br />trucks anrd /orthe outside storage hailers when ge area show <br />While they are non the plans will be <br />not <br />City must also are considered n use, used to store <br />co <br />touth, nsi bet <br />re In this re consider protection of the permitted in an <br />creenin9 /lardscapea is felt that the City residential vstrial district, the <br />a p °� According Parking tY should pay parti areas to the east <br />ment for industrial property tO the existing °r attention <br />be 9.3 s of employees, of floor ereatwS5p0ce$'pe Ohree "ce, th::i,:1re_ <br />9'0 spac <br />es of is rmation has e However ely to °n has be 9..3 aces iges' t be us 99ethe uses h trepr osed ah supplied on potential use parking plomeP Although e. current oord Hance requirement for her businesses" tle eq 'hng would <br />hat excessive , Past experience nt for "other could be put. <br />past, a require <br />r s somewh and of °nesshaCe been suggestedsb haws that this requirement is one <br />for parking uento -dote standard per 200 square Y Midwest Planning eqa morent feet is be ader of spa Based upon o space per 200 square ant has propose considered more <br />adequate. <br />miffed in ordinance also s would be 46.5 As such parking f 1ooconsidered eto <br />hood nY fro states that "off <br />business districts". Ya d °r side Yard t et <br />sire Parkin <br />Based bordering 9 will not <br />o not been included 9 on a street except <br />in the process wed in the upon past discussion of be Per_ <br />decision been <br />of reviewing. new Zoning this tin City isor- <br />standard, to whether to continue theOidinanae draft which,teme neighbor- <br />hood <br />it <br />ve the old standard sor approve ethepolicy <br />l ty is <br />Proposed <br />Page 3 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.