Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 8, 1999 <br />Dan Weisenberger, U.S. West, thought it might be possible, but likely <br />would not be co- locatable at a 55 -foot height. Extending the tower to 75 <br />feet would definitely make it co- locatable. <br />Knudsen indicated that the tower must be co- locatable under the <br />ordinance. Keis agreed, and stated that he would like U.S. West to give <br />the Commission the information at what height the tower becomes co- <br />locatable, and not expect the Commission to come up with this number. <br />The City Planner indicated that it is his understanding that antenna have to <br />be 15 to 20 feet apart. Therefore, if U.S. West places their antenna at 55 <br />feet, another carrier would have to place them at 70 to 75 feet. The <br />current ordinance allows a tower of 75 feet in height in the B -3 District. If <br />U.S. West places antenna at 55 feet, than a height of 75 feet would <br />accommodate another carrier. <br />Weisenberger agreed that the 75 foot height would provide enough <br />separation for another carrier. <br />Montour pointed out that the engineering information is from U.S. West. <br />The next carrier will supply their engineering information. Montour <br />questioned whether the Commission receives a lot of biased information <br />and suggested that perhaps some independent information should be <br />sought. <br />Keis suggested that with all the highways running through Little Canada, <br />this is a prime location for towers. <br />The City Planner reported that the City has the right to have an <br />independent review of the engineering information that has been <br />submitted. The Planner also pointed out that there is evidence that the <br />City's ordinance is working given that most of the towers in the City have <br />co- locations on them. Because of the configuration of the community, <br />Little Canada will get a lot of tower requests. <br />Knudsen pointed out that this U.S. West tower must be constructed to hold <br />at least one other carrier. Weisenberger replied that the 55 foot height <br />works for U.S. West. However, the tower can be built so that it can be <br />extended as high as needed to carry another provider. If required by the <br />City, U.S. West can construct the tower at the 75 -foot height right away. <br />Either way the tower would be co- locatable. <br />The Planner pointed out that the City's ordinance provides that towers less <br />than 120 feet must provide for one additional carrier, while towers greater <br />than 120 feet must provide for two additional carriers. <br />Page 62 <br />