My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-24-1999 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
03-24-1999 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 3:09:29 PM
Creation date
8/29/2012 2:24:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MARCH 11, 1999 <br />CUP FOR <br />TELECOMMU- <br />NICATIONS <br />TOWER - <br />U.S. WEST <br />Pat Conlin and Dan Weisenberger, U.S. West, appeared before the <br />Commission requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to <br />construct a telecommunications tower, antenna, and ground equipment <br />at the Citgo Station located at 300 Little Canada Road. Conlin explained <br />the design process which U.S. West has undertaken for their PCS cellular <br />system. Conlin also reported that U.S. West has a hole in its system in the <br />area of 694136135E resulting in dropped calls and capacity problems. <br />Therefore, U.S. West has been looking at sites in an effort to construct an <br />additional tower and fill this hole. <br />Conlin reported that they have reviewed the City Planner's report relative <br />to co- locations. Conlin indicated that the City's water tower is outside the <br />target area since the hole in the system lies between 35E and Rice Street. <br />Also, the water tower may be too high to serve as a fill -in site for this area. <br />Conlin reported that the Citgo site was chosen because of its proximity to <br />the freeway. There are properties on the west side of the freeway that <br />were looked at; however, these sites are too low to meet U.S. West's <br />coverage needs. Conlin was not sure why the Fire Station site was not <br />identified. He indicated that it may work from a technical standpoint. <br />However, it may be necessary to construct a monopole that is between five <br />and fifteen feet higher if that site is utilized. Conlin felt that the monopole <br />would be less visible from the Citgo property, therefore, from an <br />aesthetics standpoint, Citgo is the preferred location. <br />Conlin submitted a letter to the Commission that addressed the <br />outstanding issues raised in the City Planner's report. <br />Keis asked about the fire station site. Conlin reported that the City's <br />ordinance provides for a priority listing of sites and encourages co- <br />locations in an effort to address the proliferation of antennas. <br />Montour pointed out the two existing antennas along Highway 36. <br />Weisenberger reported that the Highway 36 towers were looked at, and it <br />was felt that the towers along 36 were too far to fill the hole U.S. West <br />has. They also looked at St. John's Church, but it was felt that the stone <br />construction of the steeple would absorb the signal and limit coverage. <br />Weisenberger reported that in their next construction phase, he would like <br />to locate an antenna on the water tower. However, right now that location <br />is too far from their hole to be effective. Weisenberger reported that U.S. <br />West wants to be good neighbors and chose a site that blends in. With <br />regard to the Fire Station site, Weisenberger reported that simply placing <br />an antenna on the roof would not provide adequate coverage. A pole <br />would be needed to raise the antenna to the required level. Weisenberger <br />Page 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.