Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 26, 1991 <br />also felt that it was not easy for those business <br />owners to complain in the first place. <br />Frattalone reported that he has changed the entrance to <br />his property moving it further to the south so that the <br />business across the street cannot see much of the truck <br />traffic. Frattalone also suggested that he berm around <br />the front corner of the property. Frattalone suggested <br />that there were some problems with the appearance of <br />the rear yard of the business across the street. <br />Scalze agreed that there were a lot of code problems in <br />the area that need to be cleaned up, and stated that <br />the City has not been aggressive enough in addressing <br />these problems. <br />Blesener again stated that he would support a one -year <br />extension, but felt two years was too much. Blesener <br />also felt a two -year extension would give a wrong <br />impression to the neighborhood. <br />Scalze pointed out that the recycling operation is not <br />allowable by Code, and it has been allowed to continue. <br />Hanson reported that he received a call against the <br />two -year extension, but the caller also mentioned the <br />landscape operation in the area. Hanson was not sure <br />whether the caller was concerned with the overall <br />appearance or the dust of that operation. Hanson felt <br />that Mr. Frattalone was a man of his word and would <br />continue pursuing a permit with the City of Maplewood. <br />Blesener pointed out that the entire operation began <br />when Frattalone was given a fill permit for the <br />property. That permit expired and Frattalone was <br />supposed to level the site. However, the filling <br />continued and developed into the recycling operation. <br />Hanson stated that he would support the two -year <br />extension and stated that the Council would pursue that <br />Mr. Frattalone is working on a permit with the City of <br />Maplewood. <br />Scalze questioned how that would be done. <br />Frattalone stated that if he was given the two -year <br />extension, he would not take advantage of the full two <br />years if Maplewood grants him a permit. Frattalone <br />stated that he would be willing to amend his <br />development agreement to include that provision. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />Page 52 <br />