My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-25-1999 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
05-25-1999 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2012 10:59:14 AM
Creation date
8/30/2012 10:28:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
on this land, irrespective of the municipal boundary location. Due to the need to share <br />utility access, a joint powers agreement will be required whether the municipal boundary <br />is changed or remains in place. <br />Shoreland Zoning <br />Twin Lake is classified as a Recreational Development lake by the Department of Natural <br />Resources. Lots which adjoin the lake (riparian) must be 20,000 square feet in area, and <br />maintain a 75 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water (OHW) level. Both the area and <br />setback calculation are measured from the OHW, as any land below the OHW is <br />considered a part of the public water. As a result, Lots 6 and 7 of Block 2 will need to be <br />increased in size. Lot 6 contains approximately 19,100 square feet above the OHW, and <br />Lot 7 contains approximately 17,100. Because the remainder of the lots are all <br />significantly larger than required, there should be adequate opportunity to shift lot lines <br />slightly to accommodate this additional area. <br />With the exception of Lot 6, each of the building pads is shown in conformance with the <br />setback requirements. The pad on Lot 6 would encroach into the required setback by <br />about 5 feet. This should be corrected on the final grading plan. It should also be noted <br />that the Shoreland Management ordinance requires that the lakeward one -half of the <br />setback area (37.5 feet) is classified as Shore Impact Zone, and is not to be disturbed from <br />its natural state. The remaining 37.5 feet of the setback area may be landscaped, but may <br />not contain any structures. <br />The DNR has suggested a common access to the lake serving the development. This <br />recommendation is designed to minimize the number of individual dock accesses to the <br />small lake. The City should discuss the issue of private dock access with the developer. <br />Streets, Grading and Drainage <br />All building pads appear to conform with the flood protection ordinance regarding elevation <br />above the flood elevation of the lake. Lots 10, 11, and 12 require fill to accommodate this <br />requirement. In that regard, the cul -sac is also located on fill, about three feet higher than <br />the existing grade. The fill for these three houses will increase the amount of tree loss on <br />this end of the plat. The City's tree preservation /replacement requirements state that <br />significant trees lost to development grading such as this must be replace at a 1:1 caliper <br />inch ratio, up to a maximum of 30 caliper inches per acre. The area which is being filled <br />or graded outside of the street right -of -way and house pads should be calculated to <br />provide a tree replacement requirement for this plat. The developer has the option of <br />either surveying the trees being lost for a specific number, or providing the maximum <br />requirement (30" per acre) in lieu of a survey. <br />Page 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.