My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1998 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
09-09-1998 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2012 2:29:36 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 2:28:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(651) 484 -2177 / FAX: (651) 484 -4538 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey and Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel R. Manson, City Administrator <br />DATE: September 4, 1998 <br />RE: Centerville Road Water Main Improvement <br />MAYOR <br />Michael I. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scaize <br />Jim LaVaile <br />Steve Morelan <br />Bob Pedersen <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R Hanson <br />The property owner at 2921 Centerville Road has contacted the City informing us that his <br />property was previously assessed for water main. Our initial review of the records didn't <br />indicate this fact. Upon tardier checking of both the City's and the County's records, we <br />have learned that this assessment did occur. As a result, it has become necessary to <br />modify the assessment roll for this project. (Revised assessment roll attached.) <br />It is my recommendation that we assess this improvement as noticed with the City <br />picking up the cost of the assessment listed for 2921 Centerville Road. This $4,117.76 <br />would come from the Water & Sewer Capital Replacement Account. My rational for this <br />is: <br />• We noticed the lower rate and that rate is one of the higher per lot assessments <br />we have had for water main that wasn't a single frontage situation. <br />• It appears that a couple of these lots were added as an afterthought to an <br />earlier water main project whereby the main was not extended in front of <br />these properties even though service was allowed, Therefore, the people <br />assessed at that time benefited to the extent that additional lots were included <br />in the project without the addition of corresponding improvement costs <br />needed to properly serve these lots. Therefore, the assessments at that time <br />were likely lower than they should have been making today's assessments <br />higher than they should be. <br />The Council will need to address this issue and any objections that may be raised at the <br />hearing. <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.