Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 8, 1998 <br />CABLE TV <br />FRANCHISE <br />Fahey pointed out that at the last Council meeting two issues of concern <br />were raised in considering the renewal of the Cable TV franchise. Those <br />issues dealt with the undergrounding of cable and the City's rights in the <br />event of abandonment of cable plant. In response to those concerns, the <br />City Attorney reviewed his memo dated July 2 "d. The Attorney pointed <br />out that Section 3, Subdivision 4 of the Franchise Ordinance provides that <br />cable facilities would be required underground if all other utilities are <br />underground. However, there is no provision in the franchise ordinance <br />requiring cable facilities underground if other utilities are not. Section <br />2302.250 of the City's Rights -Of -Way Ordinance requires new utility <br />construction and the replacement of old equipment to be underground <br />unless otherwise provided in the existing Franchise Ordinance. Therefore, <br />the Franchise Agreement appears to be the operative ordinance. The <br />Attorney also pointed out that the term "abandonment" is not really <br />defined in the Franchise Agreement, and the Rights -Of -Way Ordinance <br />refers to abandonment as equipment that has not been used for two years. <br />John Gibbs, attorney representing Media One, appeared before the <br />Council and stated that Media One understands that it is their obligation to <br />put the Cable TV plant underground in the event other utilities go <br />underground. Gibbs indicated that as part of the upgrade of the Cable TV <br />system, there will not be much abandoned plant, and if the City requires <br />this plant to be removed, the company would be willing to do it. Gibbs <br />pointed out there will be a bond in place to assure that this is done. <br />However, there are times that due to safety concerns and disruption <br />concerns it is better to leave abandoned plant in place. <br />Gibbs indicated that Media One accepts that the Franchise Ordinance and <br />the Rights -Of -Way Ordinance are two separate documents which are not <br />perfectly worded, and offered to address the issue of the interpretation of <br />abandonment in a letter to the City. <br />Gibbs reported that in upgrading the Cable TV system, Media One is <br />changing out the electronics of the system. The coaxial cable is still <br />necessary for the operation of the system after the upgrade. The coaxial <br />cable is still necessary for the system to work. Fiber is being added to the <br />system, but the'coaxial cable will not be abandoned. <br />With regard to the issue of abandonment, Fahey suggested that the <br />franchise agreement provide for notice from Media One if a portion of the <br />system is being abandoned, i.e. is not being used for transmission <br />purposes. Additionally, the franchise agreement could provide the City <br />with the authority to require removal on a discretionary basis given there <br />may be circumstances where it would be better to not require utilities to <br />dig up boulevards. <br />Page 24 <br />