Laserfiche WebLink
44 / ' : 99‘W4 `.CSC mCG,4g <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(612) 484 -2177 / FAX: (612) 484 -4538 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: March 6, 1998 <br />RE: Proposed Sewer Rate Increase <br />MAYOR <br />Michael I. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Jim LaValle <br />Steve Morelan <br />Bob Pedersen <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />Attached are updated water and sewer budgets for 1998. You will note that the water fund is <br />projecting a $52,000 loss from operations. However, given our recent earnings history and the <br />amount of depreciation allocated to this fund, that amount appears manageable. As you know, <br />actual revenues can be dramatically impacted by the summer's weather as well as items such as <br />maintenance and repair expense. I do not feel a rate increase is necessary in 1998 in this area <br />especially in light of the increase we imposed in 1997. <br />The sewer fund is another matter. We are projecting a loss of $96,000 for 1998 which comes on <br />the heals of a projected $81,000 loss in 1997. You may recall that we were hopeful that 1998's <br />treatment costs to Metropolitan Council Waste Water Services Division would go down or at <br />least not increase dramatically in 1998 given the fact that 1996 was a dry year (lower <br />infiltration/inflow I/I impact). Even with reduced flows, we received an increase of over <br />$24,000 in our sewer costs largely because treatment costs were raised to offset the treatment of <br />less flows within the Metro system. You will also note that in 1996 we experienced a profit of <br />$142,000. We felt the fund could absorb some losses to offset that large amount. With the sump <br />pump program and other I/I work, we hope to have a dramatic impact on future sewer treatment <br />costs. It must be kept in mind that those savings will not be realized until the year 2000 given <br />the lag in rate adjustments due to flow history. Therefore, we are now at the point that an <br />increase is necessary to avoid jeopardizing the stability of the fund. <br />My recommendation is to increase sewer rates by 7 1/2% ($2.15 per 1,000 gallons x 1 .075 = $2.31 <br />per 1,000). This rate would be effective with 1s` quarter utility bills to go out April 1st. I am <br />anticipating this should raise approximately $50,000 subject to variances in billable gallonage <br />and allowing for sewer users on the flat fee of $37.50 /quarter (those users are not seeing an <br />increase as the minimum charge is high enough). In looking at the attached rate comparison <br />from other cities, I feel a rate of $2.31 per 1,000 gallons of sewer treatment is competitive with <br />our neighboring jurisdictions. You will also note that the last time we increased the sewer rates <br />Page 3 <br />