My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-2012 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
09-26-2012 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2012 12:36:33 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 12:00:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 <br />Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Little Canada Planning Commission <br />FROM: Stephen Grittman <br />DATE: September 7, 2012 <br />RE: Little Canada — Zoning Amendment — Definition of Assembly <br />FILE NO: 758.10 — 12.03 <br />Background and Analysis <br />In recent months, there have been conflicts raised over the proposed use of commercial <br />or industrial facilities by religious groups. Cities have had concerns with this issue for <br />varied reasons, including economic development and job creation, tax base, and <br />potential for incompatible patterns of use in commercial or industrial areas where traffic <br />and other public facilities may not have been constructed with such uses in mind. <br />The issue is complicated by the adoption, in 2000, of the Religious Land Use and <br />Institutionalize Persons Act (RLUIPA). This federal statute essentially states that no city <br />may treat a religious use differently than a non - religious use when considering land use <br />issues, that is, if two uses are the same, the fact that one may be religious in nature <br />cannot be used to prohibit it or place conditions not common to the non - religious use. <br />RLUIPA can be a problem to interpret, and is particularly difficult to predict since in the <br />8th US Circuit Court District (which includes Minnesota), no cases have been decided to <br />provide guidance as to where the limits of legitimate municipal regulation lie. A <br />common interpretation of RLUIPA impacts would be that since churches have large <br />places of assembly, anywhere the City allows other uses that have large assemblies <br />must also allow churches — the typical example used would be movie theaters. <br />Many communities — reacting primarily to national planning and zoning publications — <br />have adopted a "hands off" approach to RLUIPA issues. In this treatment, religious <br />assemblies have been treated as allowed in any location that other public assemblies <br />are allowed, Indeed, some communities have adopted amendments to their zoning <br />ordinances allowing "places of public assembly" as a land use category. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.