Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Blesener and Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />Sharon Provos, Finance Director <br />DATE: October 22, 2012 <br />RE: Proposed 2013 Capital Improvements Program <br />Included in your agenda packet was the proposed 2013 Capital Improvements Program. As you <br />know, this is a five year program with ratification of the coming budget year as part of this <br />process, i.e. year 1 will be the approved program with years 2 through 4 being preliminary and <br />subject to modification. Here is a summary by fund of noteworthy items: <br />General Capital Improvement Fund - #400 <br />Since meeting with the Parks & Recreation Commission, a couple of notable changes occurred to <br />the revenue side of this fund. First, we removed $500,400 budgeted for the "Sale of Twin Lake <br />Land" given this sale doesn't seem likely in the foreseeable future and likely not at that amount. <br />Second, we added the General Fund Transfer of $373,660 approved at out last meeting. The net <br />impact is a reduction in revenues available of $126,740. You will note that this causes the last <br />year of the five -year program to go into a deficit. To resolve this, staff would recommend <br />removing the lower Spooner Park Shelter in the amount of $200,000 in 2017. <br />Another revenue improvement is the receipt of Local Government Aid (LGA) funding of <br />$31,562 due to our plan to reduced General Fund dependence on LGA. As you know, we <br />are slated to receive $195,843 of LGA in 2013. The LGA amounts act as "new money" to <br />this fund. They are also at risk of State reductions due to formula volatility and State <br />budget challenges. An option you could consider to achieve a quicker reduction of LGA <br />reliance in the General Fund would be to put more LGA in the GCIP Fund and reduce the <br />levy by a commensurate amount up to the current levy of $86,685 plus the $31,562 already <br />planned. This would reduce General Fund reliance by $118,247 or 60 %. The levy from <br />the GCIP would be added back to the General Fund to be a net wash in terms of dollars. If <br />LGA were cut, we could decide where the impact would be felt given there would still be <br />some LGA reliance in the General Fund. This action would help us to get to our goal <br />faster, but it uses the $86,685 GCIP levy to accomplish that. <br />