My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1998 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
02-25-1998 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 3:21:21 PM
Creation date
10/25/2012 9:05:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A year after the program began the excess discharge dropped from 30,000 to 10,000 per <br />day. <br />What about winter discharge? This problem has not yet been fully solved. Currently they <br />are installing 4" perforated tile behind the curb so owners could tie into the storm sewer. <br />They also looked at installing meters on the pumps for annual checking but decided that <br />the cost per meter was too high (about $60.00), and at simply charging for a permit by the <br />month for those who needed to discharge into the sanitary system during the winter (they <br />looked at between $25 to $50 per month). <br />Al Rolik <br />City of Shorewood <br />Approximately 2400 homes inspected. Seven percent of all the homes were found to be <br />not in compliance -- either pumping into the sanitary system or not having a "hard plumb ". <br />The handful of homes that refused inspection are charged an additional $100 per month. <br />The program cost a total of $25,000. Part of the inspection program was financed with a <br />$10,000 grant from the MWCC. These grants are no longer available. <br />Because Shorewood has issues with I & I coming from lake levels and several small <br />unmetered interceptor input and output points it is difficult to ascertain the effectiveness <br />of the sump pump discharge reduction program. However, based on their effort the <br />MWCC agreed to lower their estimates of outflow by a total of $30,000 per year. <br />David Krings <br />Lakeville <br />The City of Lakeville realizes that they have a significant infiltration problem because of a <br />high ground water level and obsolete infrastructure. They have embarked on a $9 million <br />downtown infrastructure storm sewer replacement project. In addition, they have <br />developed building codes similar to Plymouth's that require new construction to hard <br />plump a sump pump line out of new construction, and if there is an upward sloping grade <br />to the back yard, they require a tie in tile to the street storm sewer. <br />For now older residential developments will continue to pump into the system (costing a <br />city of 24,000 about $200,000 per year). In the future they hope to upgrade all city <br />streets to have storm sewer runoff. At that point they will investigate a sump pump <br />inspection program. <br />Charlotte Erickson <br />Minnetrista <br />Minnestrista successfully completed a sump pump inspection program in 1993. For there <br />600 homes they developed a program where owners had several months to sign -up for the <br />Page 103 <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.