My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2013 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
01-23-2013 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 2:08:55 PM
Creation date
1/23/2013 3:07:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In reviewing the options, you will see we can contribute $200,000 and still maintain a <br />positive fund balance in Fund 450 through 2017. In theory, you could spend $400,000 <br />and accomplish that outcome, but the fund balance will be drained to a very low level. It <br />should also be noted that if we eliminate this project entirely, our remaining fund balance <br />will stay the same as shown on the Current Budget sheet given the expense and revenues <br />offset each other. <br />One other factor that you can consider, but we won't have resolved in time to make this <br />decision relates to Xcel's statement that they have included costs associated with looping <br />another underground line on McMenemy closer to Viking Drive. Their representatives <br />told us that this was required by code. Staff believes we should have them provide us <br />with the cost added to the estimate to do this work and the "code" requirements that <br />obligate us to pay for it. <br />As was noted at the last meeting, the opportunity to bury the lines is occuning due to the <br />significant work being done on Little Canada Road. If not done at this time, the <br />opportunity to do so will likely not occur for about 20 years. <br />Another question raised at the last meeting was how we would answer residents that say <br />they are helping to pay for this cost and then want to know when their street will be done. <br />I think two factors are important to note in considering this question. First, many newer <br />streets (developed from the mid 80's on) would already have buried utilities. Secondly, <br />the streets we are burying are major thoroughfares for our community. Staff would not <br />advocate burying lines on all streets as a matter of policy. However, it does seem prudent <br />to consider this action on Rice Street, Little Canada Road, and Edgerton Street because of <br />their prominence in our community. One may also want to argue County Road C, <br />LaBore Road, and others should be considered in this light. <br />This is a tough decision and it does cost a lot of money. The decision comes down to <br />weighing the cost versus the aesthetic improvement created by this action. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.