Laserfiche WebLink
cetkfr 29a74 C ((flaw <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(612) 484 -2177 / FAX: (612) 484 -4538 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel R. Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: March 7, 1997 <br />RE: Water & Sewer Rates <br />MAYOR <br />Michael I. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Jim LaValle <br />Steve Morelan <br />Bob Pedersen <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />In the 1997 budget process, I identified the fact that both the water and sewer funds were <br />projecting net losses for the 1997 fiscal year. The Water Fund was projected to lose <br />approximately $53,000 based on estimated revenues reflecting an average rainfall year. (Note <br />that 1995 was a wet year and revenues were down whereas 1996 was a dry year and revenues <br />were up. I have averaged the two of those years to arrive at my estimated revenue figure.) It has <br />been four years since we have increased our water rates and it is probably time that some <br />adjustment be made in order that we preserve the integrity of the fund. (You will note that the <br />Water Fund balance has declined somewhat since 1991. See attached information.) <br />To offset the projected deficit in the Water Fund, we would need a rate increase of <br />approximately 6.3 %. This would require an increase of 11 cents per 1,000 gallons in both our <br />summer and winter rates. (Winter rate is currently $1.71 per 1,000 and summer rate is $1.77 per <br />1,000) Based on surveys of neighboring communities, this rate is competitive given the fact that <br />the water we provide is already softened. <br />Our sewer budget projected a deficit of approximately $63,000. This is due to the increase in <br />costs from Metropolitan Water Water Services Division of almost 25% over 1996. Given the <br />fact that 1996 was a dry year, I would expect our costs to be reduced in 1998. Also, the Sewer <br />Fund balances have continued to grow since 1991. Therefore, I feel we can absorb this increase <br />in expenditures in the 1997 budget year based on the fact that we anticipate treatment costs to be <br />less in 1998 and given the infiltration and inflow analysis study that is presently underway. <br />Hopefully, this will result in a decrease in sewer treatment volumes in future years. <br />Therefore, it is my recommendation that we increase our water rates by the amount indicated <br />below: <br />Page 36 <br />