Laserfiche WebLink
The City will comply with MS., Sections 1161993 to 116,1995 to the extent the tax increment assistance <br />under this TIF Plan does not fall under any of the above exemptions. <br />(AS MODIFIED ON APRIL 10, 2013 TO INCLUDE NEW LANGUAGE IN CURRENT LAW) <br />(23) Property tax abatements granted under M.S., Section 469.1813 to property that is subject to <br />valuation under Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100. <br />The City will comply with M.S., Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 to the extent the tax increment assistance <br />under this TIF Plan does not fall under any of the above exemptions in this Subsection <br />Subsection 2 -13. County Road Costs <br />Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. Ia, the county board may require the City to pay for all or part of <br />the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment will, in <br />the judgment of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of road <br />improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five years <br />under a capital improvement plan or within five years under another county plan. <br />If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the City within forty -five days <br />of receipt of this TIF Plan. In the opinion of the City and consultants, the proposed development outlined <br />in this TIF Plan will have little or no impact upon county roads, therefore the TIF Plan was not forwarded to <br />the county 45 days prior to the public hearing. The City is aware that the county could claim that tax <br />increment should be used for county roads, even after the public hearing. <br />Subsection 2 -14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions <br />The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TI F <br />Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the City has determined that such <br />development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the <br />fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as <br />follows if the "but for" test was not met: <br />City of Little Canada <br />Tax Increment Financing flan for Tax Increment Financing District No 6 -1 2 -12 <br />