Laserfiche WebLink
LOCAL VOICES <br />Bridging Generations Together <br />ould we consider our cities <br />co be healthy and liveable if <br />our senior citizens were coo <br />fearful of becoming victims <br />of juvenile crime co leave <br />their homes when school is <br />not in session? Unfortunately, <br />with fears fanned by the me- <br />dia, that is the case in too many homes <br />in Minnesota. While our police offic- <br />ers, teachers, and clergy cry to reassure <br />the public that only a few teens in our <br />communities cause trouble, those few <br />can wreak havoc on the perception of <br />neighborhood safety. Who can change <br />that perception? <br />I believe that the most effective edu- <br />cators about teen issues are teens them- <br />selves. If we create opportunities for <br />teens and adults to listen respectfully to <br />each other, we will reduce fears, build <br />crust, create more realistic planning, <br />and develop supportive relationships <br />among different generations. While <br />natural disasters, like the recent floods, <br />bring people from all generations to- <br />gether to respond to an immediate cri- <br />sis, the challenge to our leadership skills <br />is fostering that cooperative interaction <br />on an ongoing basis. Many of our pub- <br />lic policies and funding practices segre- <br />gate people 'oy age, which is especially <br />detrimental to our youngest and oldest <br />community members. Compared to <br />other levels of government, tides have <br />unique capabilities in promoting and <br />supporting activities that bring people <br />of all generations together in their own <br />neighborhoods. <br />We can provide opportunities for <br />youth to participate actively in the <br />work of the community by serving on <br />city committees, cask forces. and com- <br />missions. When we sincerely and re- <br />spectfully ask for their opinions and <br />their ideas, they respond. The key <br />word is "ask." In focus groups, teens <br />By Sue Gehrz <br />cell us that the major deciding factor in <br />choosing to participate is whether they <br />are invited by an adult or teen who <br />they respect. This is really no different <br />than how most adults get involved. <br />Teens care about their families and <br />friends. and have a major stake in the <br />safety of their communities. In many <br />forums, including the teen panel at the <br />LMC 1997 Annual Conference, teens <br />tell us they want and need adults to set <br />and enforce rules. Most victims ofju- <br />venile crime are other juveniles. If <br />adults shirk their dudes, youth cannot <br />feel safe and secure in their homes. <br />schools, neighborhoods, or work <br />places. <br />If we are sincerely interested in pre - <br />venting came, we need to put energy <br />into bridging our generation gaps. Ex- <br />perts in the field of corrections tell us <br />chat our prisons are full of people who <br />never learned to use their leisure time <br />productively and who did not have <br />enough contact with caring adults and <br />good role models. Our retired residents <br />have so much to offer the young <br />people in our communities. Whether <br />they are tutoring in reading or math: <br />teaching hobbies and skills: or just serv- <br />ing as an accessible, interested adult — <br />they can meet crincai needs in the <br />positive development of our vouch. <br />Our city commissions, cask forces. <br />and recreadon programs all provide op- <br />porcunides for training and mencoring <br />relationships to form while youth gain <br />practical skills and experience in effec- <br />tive planning and problem solving. Yet <br />we look around at most of our city <br />planning meetings, we are likely to see <br />participants between the ages of 33 and <br />64, We are often missing the younger <br />and older generations. Imagine how <br />much better our decisions would be if <br />we could more effectively tap into the <br />i perspecnves and experiences of all the <br />age groups that will be affected by our <br />decisions? <br />Some Minnesota cities are finding <br />creative ways to reduce generational <br />• segregation and competition for public <br />• resources. Falcon Heights recennv <br />sponsored an intergenerational dialogue <br />where 51 people between the ages of <br />11 and 81 brought their unique per- <br />. spec-rives to work together on recom- <br />mending ways to reduce conflict <br />among neighbors and increase inter- <br />; generational interaction in our city. <br />Our council and commissions will ud- <br />lize some of their 48 recommendations <br />in setting our 1998 goals. Intergenera- <br />clonal dialogues on other topics have <br />been conducted in Sc. Paul. Minneapo- <br />lis, South Sc. Paul, Rosemount, <br />Moorhead. Roseville, Duluth, and <br />Bloomington. This is one cool for <br />building trust and communication <br />across all five generations living in our <br />communities and for developing coor- <br />dinated action plans around a local is- <br />sue. The League of Minnesota Cities <br />Improving Community Life Commit - <br />cee is collecting information about <br />intergenerational strategies used by cites <br />across Minnesota. Please contact the <br />committee and let us know what is <br />working m your community. <br />This fall, juvenile crime and youth <br />issues will be part of the evening <br />agenda for the League's Regional <br />Meetings held across the state (see page <br />28). We hope local teens can be in- <br />ciuded in these discussions and encour- <br />: age you to bring your quesnons, ideas. <br />and experiences to the meeting closest <br />to your city. X <br />Sue Gehrz is mayor of Falcon Heights, <br />chair of the LMC Improving Community <br />Life Committee, and has a consulting busi- <br />ness specializing in intergenerational com- <br />munity organizing. <br />36 <br />Page 69 <br />AUGUST '.997 <br />