Laserfiche WebLink
No Answer, per se, has been filed, but defendant has been <br />represented in both hearings by counsel, and this representation <br />led to shortening of the procedures by agreement that the house <br />in question was destroyed and could be razed The attorney fees <br />ordered paid were reasonable for the time the Court saw the <br />defense attorney contribute. <br />Based upon the foregoing, and the files, records and <br />arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following <br />ORDER <br />1. That the house may be razed to the foundation. <br />2. That the written answer shall be filed. <br />3. That the defense attorney is to be paid the $700 in <br />attorney fees. <br />Dated at St. Paul, Minnesota, this 15th day of September, <br />1992. <br />BY THE COURT: <br />JO EPH E. SALLAND <br />Judge of District Court <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Plaintiff complains now about the status of the first <br />hearing in that it was informal, in chambers, and not <br />transcribed. All of the ingredients for a formal hearing were <br />there, i.e. a court reporter, courtroom, witnesses. No one <br />thought it was necessary. Hindsight is wonderful. <br />Page 8 <br />Salland, J. <br />