My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-1996 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
05-22-1996 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2013 9:16:06 AM
Creation date
3/12/2013 9:12:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MAY 9, 1996 <br />CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMITS - <br />ACCESSORY <br />BUILDINGS <br />the Watershed recommended action on the plat be tabled <br />until a spring wetland delineation could be prepared. <br />That has been done, and the Watershed has accepted the <br />delineation. As a result, the preliminary plat as <br />designed is acceptable to the Watershed. The Planner <br />also pointed out that a variance of one foot is <br />necessary for right -of -way width at County Road D. <br />There is 49 feet of right -of -way at County Road D, and <br />the Code requires a 50 -foot right -of -way for <br />residential streets. <br />The County Road D property owners immediately east of <br />where the road is proposed indicated that the County <br />would like their driveway access to come in off <br />Stoneridge. <br />Mark Ashby, developer of Stoneridge, pointed out that <br />the City Planner has suggested the County may raise the <br />issue, and that the developer should check with the <br />property owner to determine if their driveway access <br />can be via Stoneridge Court. <br />There was no one else present from the general public <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Keis recommended approval of the one -foot variance for <br />street right -of -way for Stoneridge Court at its <br />entrance from County Road D based on the recommendation <br />of the City Planner in his February 2, 1996 report. <br />Motion seconded by Barraclough. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />Carson recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat for <br />Stoneridge Addition subject to the recommendations of <br />the City Planner as outlined in his report dated <br />February 2, 1996. <br />Motion seconded by Knudsen. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />The Commission reviewed the Administrative Assistant's <br />report dated April 24, 1996 summarizing the City's <br />actions over the past few years in approving <br />Conditional Use Permits for accessory buildings. <br />3 <br />Page 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.