Laserfiche WebLink
PROPERTY DI- <br />VISION <br />427 E VIKING <br />DRIVE <br />City Administrator stated that the triangular piece of land <br />was to be sold to the Denery property landowners for a price <br />of $15,000, and the Denery property landowners were dedicating <br />the southerly portion of their property to the City. He <br />explained this would provide the City with another segment of <br />property under the power lines, thus enabling the City to <br />further extend the trailway. He further revealed that the <br />city would be taking a park charge for the three lots on the <br />west side of the proposed development in addition to the land <br />transactions. <br />Remerowski questioned who would be paying for the connection <br />segment of trail within this development, and what the trail <br />material would consist of. Sanders answered that the <br />developer is usually the one who would pay. Remerowski <br />questioned.. whether Gust was aware of this additional financial <br />responsibility. Gust replied he was, but wanted further <br />clarification as far as where the trail would begin and end. <br />Remerowski explained the trail would be between lots 5 and 6, <br />and connect to the land under the power lines. Gust stated he <br />would make note of this consequence for the developer. <br />First, Remerowski made a motion to approve a 6 foot asphalt <br />trail with a low split rail fence at the entrance between lots <br />5 and 6, to be paid for by the developer. In addition, <br />Remerowski further moved that land be accepted in lieu of a <br />park charge for the development of lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, <br />and a park charge of $625 per lot be assessed for lots 1, 2, <br />and 3. Lastly, Remerowski moved that the purchase price for <br />the triangular piece of property to be sold to the Denery <br />landowners be $.40 per square foot, or approximately $15,000, <br />and that this money be placed in the park acquisition fund. <br />Holm seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />Gust questioned if the City had personnel assigned to <br />determine if trees on the edge or right of way of this <br />development should be removed, if necessary, and if removed, <br />which would need to be replaced due to a tree preservation <br />ordinance. The City Administrator relayed that the City does <br />have a tree preservation ordinance, and that Mr. Gust could <br />work with staff to address compliance. <br />Johnson stated that correspondence was received from <br />Roland L'Allier, 427 East Viking Drive, requesting he <br />be allowed to split his property. <br />Sanders remarked this request is standard, and the lot split <br />would not impact any park land. Sanders recommended the <br />standard lot charge. <br />Holm made a motion that the standard lot charge be accepted <br />for the lot split for 427 East Viking Drive. <br />Motion seconded by Johnson. <br />2 <br />Page 14 <br />