Laserfiche WebLink
OCT-08 -1996 15:19 HRIPN M OLSEN <br />612 286 2174 P.05 <br />i POLICY ANALYSIS SERIES <br />c <br />C <br />ISSUES RELATED TO WELSCH v. NOOT /NO. 11 <br />A : at is of Minn <br />In a :diate <br />Pro <br />es a Values of Cmmnunit <br />It es or enta 1 etarded - <br />ert <br />• <br />Since the 1960s, the ideology underlying provision of services to developmen- <br />tally disabled people, and the methods of treatment deemed appropriate have <br />undergone a dramatic shift. <br />The tens "normalization" most frequently used to name this shift, encompasses <br />several interrelated movements. Delnstitutionalization, the most important of <br />these, aims to return developmentally disabled people to community settings <br />and to enhance the system of care provided to those who remain in institutions. <br />Successful dein$titutionalization requires an adequate supply of appropriate <br />community placements and implies integration of developmentally disabled people <br />into the community. While the first requirement can be met with sufficient <br />- funds and other government action, integration into the community is a more <br />- subtle obstacle - -a collection of factors which hamper community acceptance of <br />developmentally disabled people. Zoning legislation and court action can force <br />neighborhood compliance, but neither is equipped to deal with the emotional <br />concerns that underlie a neighborhood's attempts to exclude a group home. <br />Wherever group homes are proposed, neighborhood opponents present a familiar <br />litany of resistance. Though their concerns run the gamut from fear of <br />increased criminal activity to concern for the safety of group home residents, <br />these diverse complaints often mask a larger concern_ decline in property val- <br />ues of their own homes. <br />• <br />This containpargroupshomeh the reality of for retarded people. values in <br />asda measure. <br />property values of group home neighborhoods were analyzed for the year preced- <br />ing and the year fallowing the establishment of the home. Changes in these <br />property values were compared to changes in similar neighborhoods without group <br />homes to determine if the establishment of a home caused a decline in the <br />assessed value of surrounding property. <br />I. THE SITUATION IN MINNESOTA <br />Minnesota was an early eader in developing community alternatives to insti- <br />tutional care. The number of mentally retarded individuals in grpgp homr5 <br />Asset sled value; the value of a home as determined by the tax assessor in cal- <br />culating property tax. Because many states limit the annual increase•in asses- <br />sed value, the market value of a home often exceeds its assessed value. <br />DEVELOPMENTAL OI$ABILITIE9 PLANNING • DEPARTMENT Off ENEAQY. PLANNING ANO DEVELOPMENT <br />201 CAPITOL SQUARE 91.00. • 550 CEDAR STREET • ST. PAUL, MN 55101 • 61212W6•4010 <br />OCT-07 -1996 15:42 <br />6125256619 <br />Page 10 <br />93% <br />P.05 <br />