Laserfiche WebLink
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies <br />and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br />Provided the proposed use meets all applicable performance standards and is <br />found to be compatible with the area, the proposed use is considered consistent <br />with the policies and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />2. The proposed site is or will be compatible with the present and future land <br />uses of the area. <br />The following is a listing of land uses and zoning designations which surround the <br />subject site: <br />Direction <br />Land Use <br />Zoning <br />North <br />Vacant/Multiple Family <br />R -1 <br />South <br />Highway 36 <br />R -1 <br />East <br />Single Family Residential <br />R -1 <br />West <br />Single Family Residential <br />R -1 <br />The proposed garage location upon the property will no result in a change in land <br />use. Provided all applicable setbacks are satisfied, the proposed use is considered <br />compatible with surrounding land uses. Also to be noted is that there has been no <br />neighborhood objection to the building relocation proposal. <br />3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. <br />As a condition of CUP approval, all applicable performance standards will need to <br />be satisfied. Specific performance standards will be discussed in later sections of <br />this report. <br />4. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it <br />is proposed. <br />It is City policy to require applicants to demonstrate that the proposed use will not <br />have a negative impact on area property values. The applicant has submitted such <br />evidence of no impact in the form of a realtor's letter, attached as Exhibit E. While <br />such letter is not considered a full "appraisal ", staff has not received any evidence <br />to the contrary which would demonstrate possible negative property value impacts. <br />2 <br />Page 59 <br />