My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-1985 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
09-25-1985 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2013 11:10:37 AM
Creation date
3/19/2013 11:07:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 8, l035 <br />Bess Boss commented that the issue of the house would be discussed at the <br />Subdivision public hearing and reported that he is requesting concept approval <br />(Cont.) tonight. <br />Grittman state <br />divide the prop <br />requires the non <br />the location of <br />property. <br />that the location of the house inhibits the ability to <br />rty. Crittman again pointed out that th ordinance <br />conformity to be lessened. Grittman so stated that <br />e house will be an incumbrence on he title of the <br />Mr. Boss reported hat his plans were to le e the house and rent it out <br />for four or five y ars. Then his son wit eventually build on the <br />property and the ho se will be torn dow <br />Timmons pointed out that a portion of the house is on the alleyway. <br />Timmons asked why th vacation wa: not being pursued. Mr. Boss reported <br />that there have been ome negat°ve reactions from the adjacent property <br />owners on the vacatio Boss stated that he did not want to complicate <br />the matter and, theref re, ithdrew this portion of his request. <br />Mr. Gene Fasciana state <br />reason that he was op <br />property and he wou <br />property. Therefore, <br />that he was the adjacent property owner and the <br />.os =d to the vacation was that he had commercial <br />have to maintain certain setbacks to residential <br />it would be to his advantage to keep the alleyway. <br />Mrs. Timmons �vLated that she would like a legal opinion on the question <br />of the house,:` DeLonais suggested that <br />the Commis /ion gets more information. <br />Timmons pointed out that Boss's request still consists of four lots and, <br />therefore, would be subject to platting. <br />Boss requested that the Commission give him concept approval based on <br />his replatting the property. <br />Mrs. Timmons recommended concept approval of the Boss Subdivision of <br />five lots contingent upon the replatting of the property and the issue <br />of the house being resolved. <br />the matter be tabled until <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Ducharme. <br />Motion carried 7 — 0. <br />Vitale Fence Mr. Joseph Vitale appeared before the Commission requesting a variance <br />to construct an 8 foot fence around his pool. Vitale reported that the <br />/ pool is located along County Road C and that there is a slope in the <br />road at that point that would cause headlights to reflect into the pool <br />arca with a 6 foot fence. <br />Vitale reported that the pool is located about 10 to 15 feet from the <br />existing fence that runs along County Road C. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.