Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />A.O. Op. (June 20, 1988) <br />(informal opinion). <br />See also, LMCIT Information <br />Memo, Public Hearings. <br />In unplatted areas, there is no similar guidance from the Court. However, the <br />vacation statute and due process still require the city to send notice to all <br />property owners "affected" by the vacation. Since the term is undefined in <br />statute, the city must develop a reasonable policy regarding notice. The <br />location of the individual street and the character of the surrounding <br />property should be taken into account in determining sufficient notice. <br />An informal Minnesota Attorney General letter stated that, for due process <br />reasons, it may be prudent to extend the notice requirements beyond fee title <br />owners of property to mortgagees and contract for deed vendors who may be <br />significantly affected by a vacation. <br />b) Notice to the commissioner of Natural Resources <br />If the street or any part of the street terminates at, abuts upon, or is adjacent <br />to any public water, written notice must also be served by certified mail <br />upon the commissioner of Natural Resources at least 60 days before the <br />public hearing. <br />After notice is served on the commissioner, at least 15 days prior to <br />convening the public hearing, the city council or its designee must consult <br />with the commissioner to review the proposed vacation. This consultation <br />should be documented by the city. The notice of the hearing and the <br />consultation do not create a right of intervention by the commissioner. The <br />commissioner must provide the city with its evaluation of the following: <br />• The public benefits of the proposed vacation. <br />• The present and potential use of the land for access to public waters. <br />• How the vacation would impact conservation of natural resources. <br />After receiving the commissioner's evaluation, the city should respond to <br />the commissioner's concerns in its formal findings of fact granting or <br />denying the vacation. <br />c) Conducting the public hearing <br />The fundamental purpose for holding a public hearing is to provide due <br />process —a chance to speak and be heard —to all persons affected by the <br />proposed vacation. Public hearings should include complete disclosure of <br />what is being considered, and a fair and open assessment of the issues raised <br />by the vacation. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 7/9/2010 <br />Vacation of City Streets 21 Page 4 <br />