Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 410.33. <br />See 1landhook. Chapter 4. <br />Minn. Stat. §440.13. Minn. <br />Stat. §140.135 <br />When a city denies a petition for a vacation, the city should also adopt a <br />resolution setting forth the city's reasons for the denial and written findings <br />of fact. As previously discussed, detailed findings build a record necessary <br />to support the city's decision and refute allegations that the decision was <br />arbitrary or capricious. <br />After a resolution granting a vacation is adopted, the city clerk must prepare <br />a notice of completion of the proceedings containing the following: <br />• The name of the city. <br />• Identification of the street vacated. <br />• A statement of the time of completion of the vacation. <br />• A description of the real estate and lands affected thereby. <br />The notice must be presented to the county auditor, who will enter the notice <br />in the transfer records and note upon the instrument, over official signature, <br />the words "entered in the transfer record." The notice must then be recorded <br />with the county recorder. The county auditor in your county may have a <br />preferred form for the notice of completion in your jurisdiction. It is <br />advisable to check with your county auditor regarding the preferred format <br />at the beginning of a vacation proceeding. <br />Provided that all the other elements of a valid vacation proceeding exist, <br />mere failure to file the notice will not invalidate the vacation. <br />II. Home rule charter cities <br />Many home rule cities have charter provisions that establish a process for <br />the vacation of city streets. If a charter is silent on the issue, the general <br />statutory provisions previously discussed may be used. <br />Home rule charters may supplement, but not contradict state statute. The <br />general rule is that when a charter provision is in conflict with state law, the <br />statutory provision prevails and the charter provision is ineffective to the <br />extent that it conflicts with state policy. <br />Unique statutory provisions favoring petitioners and property owners in <br />home rule charter cities of the fourth- and third -class must also be <br />considered. As discussed below, these provisions only apply in certain <br />limited circumstances. Third- and fourth -class charter cities should consult <br />their attorney regarding the applicability of these provisions to their fact <br />situation. In addition, the League of Minnesota Cities recommends that <br />special attention be given to due process and notice issues, despite the <br />statutes' silence on these issues. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 7/9/2010 <br />Vacation of City Streets 2 3 Page 6 <br />