Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Slat. § 440.135. <br />Etzler v. Mondale, 123 <br />N.W.2d 603 (Minn. 1963). <br />A.O. ()p. 396-C-I (Nov. 23. <br />953). <br />B. Third -class charter cities <br />A home rule charter city of the third class (i.e., a city with more than 10,000 <br />in population, but Less than 20,000) possesses an additional unique power of <br />vacation. Upon the petition of any one owner, natural or corporate, of any <br />real estate abutting a street, a city council may vacate a street, segment or <br />portion of a street so long as the street to be vacated is not longer than the <br />distance intervening between any two adjacent intersecting streets. <br />If the street to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, the <br />petitioners requesting the vacation must serve notice of the petition by <br />certified mail upon the commissioner of Natural Resources at least 30 days <br />before the city council hearing on the matter. The notice is for notification <br />purposes only and does not create a right of intervention by the <br />commissioner. <br />The vacation of any street or segment under these provisions cannot destroy <br />or interfere with the right of any person, corporation or municipality owning <br />or having control of any electric light or telephone pole or lines existing <br />upon such street at the time of the vacation, or with any sewer or water <br />pipes, mains or hydrants thereon or thereunder to enter upon such street or <br />portion thereof vacated for the purpose of repairing the same or otherwise <br />attending thereto. <br />City council action on the petition for vacation under this unique statute may <br />be taken at any regular or special meeting duly called for considering the <br />vacation. The statute does not require a public hearing or published notice of <br />the vacation. However, the League recommends the city provide notice to <br />the affected public of the proposed vacation for due process reasons. <br />In addition, the League recommends the city hold a public hearing on the <br />vacation, providing affected parties an opportunity to comment on the <br />vacation. While the statute does not require notice and a hearing, Minnesota <br />courts have imposed such due process considerations in the past under the <br />14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. <br />Approval of the vacation under these provisions must be by resolution. A <br />copy of the resolution, duly certified by the city clerk, must be recorded in <br />the office of the county recorder in the county where such city is located <br />before the action is effective. <br />The Minnesota Attorney General has limited the application of the statute to <br />"streets" quoting the narrow language of the statute. As a result, the attorney <br />general does not believe the procedure for vacation of streets under Minn. <br />Stat. § 440.135 can be used to vacate alleys. Presumably, it also does not <br />apply to other types of public grounds or public ways. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 7/9/2010 <br />Vacation of City Streets z 5 Page 8 <br />