Laserfiche WebLink
July 11, 1986 <br />GOVERNMENT FINANCE CF =!CERS ASSOCIAT,ON <br />OPMERY NA ;NC!PJµ FNA NC; 1=RCERSASSOC'LAtON <br />04 <br />(GRS - continued from cage 2) <br />Status of 1986 GRS payments. The cuts required by Gramm - Rudman this year will have the <br />following effect on General Revenue Sharing payments for the remainder of 1986: <br />The July payment will be cut by 12.9 percent, representing a 4.3 percent cut for each <br />of the three preceding quarters. <br />The October payment will be cut by 37.9 percent. This represents a one - quarter <br />Gramm - Rudman cut of 4.3 percent, plus a funding cut of 33.6 percent. For local government <br />budget - planning purposes, Congress made provisions last year for its 8.4 percent <br />appropriations reduction to be entirely from the October payment, rather than being spread <br />over four quarterly payments. <br />WASHINGTON UPDATE <br />SOCIAL SECURITY <br />"OPT -OUT" <br />UPHELD <br />PUBLIC INVESTOR <br />HIGHLIGHTS <br />MARKET RISKS <br />SAN DIEGO PUBLISHES <br />SMALL BUSINESS <br />RESOURCE DIRECTORY <br />Enclosed with this Newsletter is what we hope will be our last Washington <br />Update on tax reform before a bill is enacted. Please read it and do the <br />necessary follow -up work with your senators and representatives in order <br />to preserve the market for tax - exempt bonds and protect the tax - exempt <br />status of governmental bonds. The efforts of GFOA members have been <br />instrumental in obtaining vast improvements in the tax -bill provisions <br />affecting state and local governments. <br />The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the 1983 Social Security Amendments <br />which repealed states' and localities' ability to withdraw from the <br />Social Security System. In a 9 -0 vote the high court overturned the <br />decision in Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment <br />by the Eastern District Court of California. This lower court found that <br />the elimination of the "opt -out" provision was a breach of contract and <br />therefore unconstitutional. In the unanimous opinion from the high court <br />the justices concluded that the "contractual right" at issue in this case <br />bears little, if any, resemblance to rights held to constitute "property" <br />within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment. in addition, the justices said <br />the Congress anticipated the need to respond to changing conditions when <br />the Social Security Act was passed in 1935 and expressly reserved the <br />right to alter, amend or repeal any provision. Fortunately, the decision <br />is on the narrow question of "contractual rights" and not on the broader <br />issue of universal Social Security coverage. Although universal coverage <br />was discussed during the oral arguments, the ruling is silent on this <br />issue. Universal coverage would require all state and local employees <br />to pay into the Social Security System, and has been debated by the <br />Congress on several occasions but never enacted. <br />The July issue of Public Investor, GFOA's monthly subscription investment <br />newsletter, discusses market price risks now facing bond investors. The <br />July issue also contains three recent GFOA policy statements regarding <br />relationships with securities dealers, master repurchase agreements and <br />intergovernmental investment pools. Other articles discuss GNMA mutual <br />funds and a small government's successful use of a forward delivery <br />contract for its bond proceeds. A complimentary copy of the July Public <br />Investor is available through the GFOA Technical Services Center in the <br />Chicago office. <br />The City of San Diego's Small Business Advisory Board, which was established <br />by the city council in 1982, this year published the San Diego Small <br />Business Reeource Directory. The directory consists of six chapters: <br />agencies providing assistance to small businesses in San Diego; financial <br />assistance; management and technical assistance; procurement assistance; <br />educational and training assistance; and publications. While the <br />directory is tailored to San Diego, it has information useful to small <br />businesses in communities throughout the country. Anyone desiring a copy <br />may send a check for $7.50 payable to Treasurer, City of San Diego to; <br />City of San Diego, Small Business Advisory Board, Economic Development <br />Division (Mail Station 502), 1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101 <br />