My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-14-1977 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1975-1979
>
1977
>
12-14-1977 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2013 9:25:34 AM
Creation date
4/4/2013 9:24:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June Demos, Mayor <br />City of Roseville <br />Subject: "Paramedic Services" for our North Suburban Area <br />Regarding the presentation being made today, the Roseville City Council is <br />quite concerned that an outside group is coming into the community, <br />supposedly making a study and then planning a pilot program for our. <br />community. <br />We question the expertise of the group involved, whether or not they have <br />the prosper background and thorough knowledge from which to make the <br />judgments required for our community. <br />Our council does not enter into any new program without a thorough study of <br />not only the needs but the effect :any such program will have on our present <br />employment force, costs and effect on current programs. <br />As a matter of background, Roseville made 911 free ambulance runs in 1976, <br />taking the people involved to the hospital of their choice in the cities of <br />St. Paul and Minneapolis. These emergency runs do not have to be a matter <br />of life and death. <br />Some of the factors our city council believes should be considered are: <br />1) What does paramedics provide that Roseville's present service from <br />police officers, trained as Emergency Medical Technicians (E.M.T.), does <br />not provide? <br />Our officers have 80 hours of training as E.M.T.'S but may not give life <br />saving fluids nor do they have radio telemetry to a hospital. But can <br />there be complications from hastily prescribed life - saving fluids when a <br />patient's history is unknown? <br />2) Would the financial commitment of a full -scale paramedic program prohibit <br />the extensive range of ambulance services now provided by our police <br />department? This concerns us as we believe our present service is <br />invaluable to a great many people. <br />3) What are the real costs? Maplewood's current cost is $272,000. Initial <br />study in our community leads us to believe that the costs will be one - <br />half million dollars within three years and if carried in the tax levy, <br />an increase of approximately 237. for just one function of the police <br />department. <br />Ultimately, the city would be forced to pay salaries to these personnel <br />which are commensurate with other salaries paid in government. Every <br />action, when dealing with employees, causes a reaction. I am told that <br />paramedics (in the metropolitan area) are now seeking a $6000 annual <br />differential over a policeman's salary; <br />1) Response time. With a limited number of units (if paramedics is ultimately <br />to serve the entire northern suburban area) what kind of response time <br />can be provided? Looking at the number of vans we now have working in the <br />city of Roseville, how could a lesser number serve this entire area? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.