My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-2013 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
04-10-2013 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 2:12:25 PM
Creation date
4/8/2013 8:52:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(AS MODIFIED APRIL 10, 2013) <br />The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of a Modification to the Tax <br />Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 -1 (District), as <br />required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: <br />1. Finding that the area added to Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 -1 is a redevelopment district <br />as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1). <br />The TIF Plan Modification adds 2 parcels and the adjacent easement property and internal rights - <br />of -way to the existing District, with plans to redevelop the area to facilitate the construction of 15 <br />units of single family housing. At least 70 percent of the area of the parcels in the District are <br />occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and <br />more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally <br />substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix F of the TIF <br />Plan.) <br />2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be <br />expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that <br />the increased market value ofthe site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax <br />Increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the <br />proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected lax increments for the <br />maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIE Plan. <br />The proposed development, in the opinion ofthe City, would not reasonably be expected to occursolely <br />through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future:This finding is supported by the <br />fact that the redevelopment proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. <br />The main purpose of the TIF Plan Modification is to add 2 parcels and the adjacent easement <br />property and internal rights -of -way to the City's TIE District No. 6 -1. The addition of the parcels <br />to the District will further enable the redevelopment within the District and further the goals set <br />in the establishment of TIF District No. 6 -1. Due to the high cost of land currently occupied by <br />substandard buildings and public improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, <br />in part, from tax increment financing. To assist the developer in acquiring the property, the City <br />has contributed 50% of the purchase price to write -down the cost of the land. The cost of a new <br />lot with all land costs, demolition and site improvements exceeds the sates value without tax <br />Increment financing. (See attachment in Appendix G of the TIF Plan.) <br />The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of <br />tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the <br />proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the <br />maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan:This finding is justified on the grounds <br />that the cost of land adds to the total redevelopment cost. Historically, site development costs in <br />this area have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. Redevelopment <br />of this site has been attempted in the past without success. The City reasonably determines that no <br />other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar <br />assistance being provided to the development. <br />APPENDIX G3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.