My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-2013 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
04-10-2013 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 2:12:25 PM
Creation date
4/8/2013 8:52:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. star. §:W0.1" <br />A.(i. Op. :%96.01 (May 22. <br />1964 A.(i.op. 396C-1 8, <br />(May 16, 1958). <br />Sea Section 11.42 above. <br />Euler v. Mondale, 123 <br />N.W.2d 6O3 (Min 1963). <br />A. Fourth -class charter cities <br />A home rule charter city of the fourth class, (Le., cities with a population of <br />10,000 or less), notwithstanding any contrary charter provision, must follow <br />a separate statute in vacating any street or highway "wherein one end of the <br />street or highway, or part thereof proposed to be vacated does not connect <br />with any other street or highway" (i.e.,. a "dead -end" street). <br />The statute provides stringent protections to property owners in home rule <br />charter cities of the fourth class who live on such "dead -end" roads. These <br />roads may only be vacated when all the owners of lands abutting both sides <br />of the street or highway have signed a petition requesting the vacation. <br />The Minnesota Attorney General has limited the application of this statute to <br />"streets and highways." As a result, the Minnesota Attorney General does <br />not believe the protections of the statute apply to property owners on dead - <br />end alleys. Presumably, such protections do not apply to property owners on <br />other types of dead -end public grounds or public ways. <br />This unique statute for fourth class charter cities does not require a public <br />hearing or published notice of the vacation in the manner otherwise required <br />under the general vacation statute. However, the League recommends the <br />city provide notice to the affected public of the proposed vacation for due - <br />process reasons. <br />In addition, the League recommends the city hold a public hearing providing <br />affected parties an opportunity to comment on the vacation. While the <br />statute does not explicitly require notice and a hearing, Minnesota courts <br />have imposed such due process considerations in the past under the 14th <br />Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. <br />The statute also does not require a finding of public benefit as discussed <br />above. However, the permissive language of the statute does not require the <br />city to vacate the street or highway upon receipt of a lawful petition. <br />The city's retinal to grant a vacation in such circumstances will be upheld <br />by the courts unless it appears that the evidence is practically conclusive <br />against the city, or that the city proceeded on an erroneous theory of' law, or <br />that it acted arbitrarily and capriciously against the best interests of the <br />public. <br />Finally, if the dead end road terminates at or abuts upon any public water, <br />the petitioners who are requesting the vacation must serve notice of the <br />petition by certified mail upon the Commissioner of Natural Resources at <br />least 30 days before the council hearing on the matter. The notice is for <br />notification purposes only and does not create a right of intervention by the <br />Commissioner. <br />League of Minnesota cities information Memo: <br />Vacation of City Streets <br />24 <br />29 <br />V9t2O10 <br />Paae 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.