My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-1978 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1975-1979
>
1978
>
12-13-1978 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2013 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
4/8/2013 2:30:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ___•n* <br />■i�i�ir0100, <br />frfr11f f� <br />Midwest <br />t _ •) <br />isennosig •• <br />ERE Enowt I Tf % -nal <br />1EEEEnEE■E ice '�f <br />EEEEE_EEAE - ■■�f <br />an Nis E \sm r Ins mourn • <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />RE: <br />BACKGROUND <br />urban planning • design • market research <br />416 east hennepin avenue minneapolis <br />minnesota 55414 (612)379 -4600 <br />Little Canada Planning Commission <br />Brad Nielsen <br />6 December, 1978 <br />Holmes Dental Clinic - Building Permit Request <br />On October 13, 1978 the applicant, Dr. Mark Holmes, submitted plans for <br />construction of a building to be used as a dental clinic on Little Canada Road <br />just east of Lake Shore Drive (see attached site location map). Our office was <br />requested to review the plans and submit a staff report evaluating the applicant's <br />proposal. A staff report was submitted on 31 October, 1978 which raised several <br />issues, most notably lack of parking spaces. In addition, Dr. Holmes asked that <br />a 10 foot variance be granted to the required 40 foot front yard setback distance <br />based upon the location of the adjacent commercial buildings to the west of the <br />site. <br />The applicant has now submitted revised plans which include more parking (see <br />attached plans). A variance to the front yard setback requirement is still <br />requested. <br />ISSUES AND ANALYSIS <br />Upon review of the applicant's revised site plan, the following issues are <br />raised. <br />1. Number of spaces required. The applicant has stated in a letter to the <br />City that "... because our estimated need is for 16 parking spaces (ten <br />employees and six patients), I suggest that a parking lot larger than 20 <br />automobile spaces is unneeded and would be detrimental to the esthetics <br />and 'green space' of the area. Therefore I request a variance to allow a <br />parking lot for 20 automobile spaces." <br />The revised site plan has shown spaces for 22 cars. Upon reviewing floor plans <br />far the proposed clinic, the structure contains approximately 3,387 square feet <br />of floor area. This is based on the total floor area - 4,000 square feet, minus <br />277 square feet for the vaulted ceiling space, minus 10 percent for mechanical <br />space. Dividing 3,387 square feet by the ordinance figure of 1 space for each <br />150 square feet results in a total of 23 required parking spaces. <br />r'fl <br />�,()cs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.