Laserfiche WebLink
20. Analytical Data <br />A. <br />B. <br />Bacteriology <br />Satisfactory - No coliform organisms were found in the samples (see attached <br />analytical data sheet). <br />Y�•- <br />Unsatisfactory - Coliform organisms were found in the samples (see attached <br />analytical data sheet). <br />Chemical <br />Samples were collected for chemical examination (see attached analytical <br />data sheet). <br />Fo saunales were collected for chemical examination at the time of this <br />investigation. <br />21. Rating <br />A. nThis water supply complies <br />Department. <br />n This water supply does not <br />j Department. <br />substantially with the standards of the <br />comply entirely With the standards of the <br />B. 93 Estimated numerical rating of this supply computed on <br />for complete compliance (see attached rating sheet). <br />97 Estimated rating that may be achieved by carrying out <br />under item 22. <br />the basis of 100 points <br />the recommendations <br />22. Recommendations <br />1. As the opportunity presents itself, all water services and building sewers which <br />are not properly constructed should be changed to conform to the Minnesota Plumbing <br />Code. <br />2. Arrangements should he made for the routine collection and 'bacteriolo :ical examination <br />of samples from the distribution system on at least a monthly basis and a permanent <br />record of these results maintained. <br />3. The opportunity for additional training in water supply t.'or - should be node available <br />to the operator. Attendance at the annual 'Water Yorks Operators' School, held in <br />Minneapolis, is a valuable experience for anyone engaged in this field. <br />Approved: <br />Paul B. John • -.n, Chief <br />Section o° ' ater Supply <br />and General Engineering <br />Kenneth 'Madison, Sanitarian <br />Environmental Field Services <br />