Laserfiche WebLink
Many communities have considered their regulations relating to accessory building and <br />garage sizes as house sizes have increased, along with the accumulation of private <br />recreational vehicles including boats, campers, ATVs, snowmobiles, and similar items, <br />as well as residential gardening equipment and other storage needs. <br />The threshold discussion always relates to attempting to ensure that garage size on a <br />parcel is reasonably proportional to the size of the principal use and structure, but at the <br />same time helps minimize unsightly outdoor storage of materials and equipment. <br />As noted above, Little Canada's code relies on three primary restrictions to limit garage <br />size. First is the straight numerical caps of 1,000 and 1,500 square feet. Second is a <br />limitation on the amount of rear yard area to be covered by a detached building. Third <br />is a prohibition on detached buildings when garage size hits the CUP size threshold. <br />These limitations are the most common used by various communities. For comparison, <br />we often find garage size limitations as low as 750 square feet, 900 square feet, 1,000 <br />square feet, and 1,200 square feet, with 1,500 a maximum where numerical sizes are <br />used. <br />There are some communities that have lifted the numerical cap, and resorted to a <br />limitation that reflects the size of the principal building. The most common of these <br />provides attached and detached garage size limited to the foundation main -floor area of <br />the principal home. <br />Many of these codes will also have a separate limiting factor for detached accessory <br />building size, such as "no greater than the foundation square footage of the principal <br />building, or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less ". The purpose of this latter clause is to <br />ensure that the principal home is always larger in size and mass than the detached <br />accessory building. <br />There are some communities that will permit much larger accessory buildings, but those <br />almost all tend to be more rural settings where larger detached accessory buildings are <br />common on larger rural parcels. <br />Summary and Recommendation <br />In summary, Little Canada's regulations are not inconsistent with the mainstream code <br />allowances for garage and accessory building size for suburban communities. If <br />anything, Little Canada's regulations would tend to the higher end of the scale. As <br />noted, there are some communities that have moved away from a fixed numerical size <br />to a proportionate regulation, basing the garage /accessory building square footage on <br />the size of the home. <br />pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Lee Elfering <br />21 <br />