Laserfiche WebLink
September 27, 1979 Page Two <br />South - Single family dwelling (113 foot wide lot) - zoned R -1 <br />West - Single family homes (3), vacant parcel - question as to zoning <br />district boundary (Tract P is B -2 and possibly a portion of Tract 0) <br />ISSUES AND ANALYSIS <br />The applicant has requested to expand the shopping center property 38 feet southward, <br />using the added area for parking. He has purchased the property just south of the shopping <br />center, intending to remove the existing garage, split the residential lot, adding 38 feet <br />to the commercial property while leaving a conforming 75 foot single family lot. He has <br />indicated that he is willing to make any other improvements the City may require in con- <br />junction with the expansion. Also, he has offered to place protective covenants or deed <br />restrictions on the 38 foot parcel to assure that it will remain used for parking and not <br />for building expansion. <br />In evaluating this request, a number of issues are raised: <br />1 . Parking. The shopping center currently has parking space available for approximately <br />25 cars at most. This includes some space at the rear of the building, however, due <br />to poor circulation, this area is considered underutilized. Additionally, a semi- <br />trailer used for storage currently uses up potential parking space. Since the City has <br />recently referenced the parking requirements contained in the draft Zoning Ordinance <br />revision, these requirements will be used in this report to evaluate the applicant's <br />property. Based on one space per 200 square feet of floor area, the existing shopping <br />center requires at least 47 spaces - nearly twice what exists. Upon field checking the <br />site, a parking shortage was very apparent, even though it was mid - afternoon. <br />Presumably the situation would worsen during rush hours. <br />The improvements proposed by the applicant would result in an ultimate parking <br />capacity of approximately 38 spaces. As can be seen by the Proposed Improvements <br />graphic attached, the additional 38 feet of parking space requested for rezoning would <br />allow parking along the south edge of the property, as well as creating a driveway to <br />the back of the building. This driveway is viewed as improving circulation in the <br />rear and thus should encourage use of the area available there for parking. <br />It should be noted that the width of the expanded parking area is considered a little <br />tight for a row of 90 degree parking plus driveway. Only 40 feet has been allowed <br />while normally 42 -44 feet would be preferred. This was done to ensure that the <br />residential lot to the south would still have 75 feet of width and remain conforming. <br />There are two ways to ensure maximum efficiency in spite of the 40 foot width: <br />1) The parking stalls should be designed and striped to be 10 feet wide rather than <br />8 1/2 or 9 feet. This allows someone backing into the driveway enough room to begin <br />turning before he is all the way into the drive; and 2) The businesses occupying the <br />shopping center should encourage employees to park in the rear and southeast corner <br />parking areas, freeing spaces in the front for customer parking. <br />