My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1979 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1975-1979
>
1979
>
11-14-1979 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 2:10:40 PM
Creation date
4/23/2013 2:17:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 27, 1979 Page Four <br />4. Rezoning. Concern has been voiced from the Council that approval of the rezoning <br />request would constitute "spot zoning ", that in the future the applicant would wish <br />to expand the existing building, and that potentially a precedent would be set <br />for expanding the commercial district further. From a planning perspective, this <br />does not in any way constitute spot zoning. Rather, it is simply an adjustment to <br />an existing district boundary. <br />In terms of future expansion of the existing shopping center, it must be noted that <br />although the proposed improvements would make the shopping center more conforming, <br />it would still remain a nonconforming structure due to lack of parking, and a non- <br />conforming structure may not be expanded. <br />In terms of setting precedence, the only precedent being set is that the City is <br />grabbing at an opportunity to resolve a noted problem situation. <br />5. Land Use Compatibility. The proposed expansion is not considered to be incompatible <br />with surrounding properties. In fact, improvement of the parking and circulation <br />systems tend to increase the compatibility. Since the applicant owns the property to <br />the south, anyone who buys that house will be aware of the parking expansion. As <br />far as residents to the southeast, the lots are considered deep enough and the houses <br />set far enough away that the expansion should have little or no impact. Further, <br />if a taller, screened fence is required, their veiw should be improved over what <br />currently exists. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based upon the preceding analysis, the following improvement opportunities are presented: <br />1. Parking for the shopping center is increased, bringing the center closer to conformance <br />with City standards. <br />2. Circulation, both for the center and Lakeshore Avenue, is improved - potentially <br />reducing congestion and traffic hazard. <br />3. Curb openings are brought up to City standards. <br />4. Recommended 48" (slatted) fence provides better screening than existing fence. <br />5. Trash areas are removed from view, improving traffic visibility and visual appearance. <br />6. Building setback (from residential property line) is brought closer to conformance <br />with City standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.