Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING <br />FEB -14 -79 CONTINUED. <br />Idems BY PERSONAL REPRESENTATION COUNCIL ACTION <br />10. Jirn Nadeau <br />Preferred Sheet Metal - Addition to building . <br />SEE CORRESPONDENCE: <br />Page- 3- 4Planning Commission report. <br />Tape No. to <br />Motion to: Approve <br />Table <br />Deny <br />Motion by 2nd by <br />Ayes Nayes <br />11. Archie Smith Assessment water Imp. 77 -1 -etc. Tape no. <br />Aud -1814- D/P 1814. <br />Parcel no. 53- 03700- 300 -01 <br />Assessment 127 Ft. <br />Mr. Smith is of the opinion the <br />assessment should be for 113 ft. <br />SEE CORRESPONDENCE: <br />Page -24- Assessment <br />Page -25- Map showing parce1-53- 3700 - 300 -01 <br />( This matter was discussed at the assessment hearing <br />held on Aug. 30 1978. The Council concured with th <br />engineer that the assessment should remain, Mr. <br />Smith was not at the hearing. <br />NOTE: Parcel 53- 03700 - 300 -01 is an irregular lot. <br />The policy for assessing irregular lots is <br />Add the front line footage and rear line <br />footage and divide by two. <br />Parcel 53- 03700- 300 -01 <br />Front yard line footage = 113. ft <br />rear yard line footage = 142. <br />Total 255 ft <br />divide by -2- = 127 ft. <br />ALSO NOTE: Parcel 53- 03700 - 321 -01 was assessed 110ft <br />using the above policy his assessment <br />should be 95 ft. <br />QUESTION: What footage is used to determine the <br />adquacy of a petition for improvement ? <br />Page -5- <br />Motion to: <br />Motion by <br />2nd by <br />Ayes Nayes <br />Motion to: <br />motion by 2nd by <br />Ayes Nayes <br />