My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-1980 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
02-13-1980 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2013 10:34:53 AM
Creation date
4/24/2013 10:31:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minor ups and downs in roadway character or ond ns the Theo r,verd <br />may exceed the prima facie limit on better portions <br />he is given the right to prove that his speed was not improper for <br />the conditions that existed at the location and at the time he was <br />cited. Law enforcement officials have the latitude to provide him <br />an "enforcement tolerance" under prima facie speed zoning. <br />MAXIMUM SPEED LIMITS - This type of speed control law provides that <br />it is illegal to.exceed the established numerric llimitounder ANY <br />conditions at ANY time.' Under "maximum" speed zoning <br />tolerance is 'intended or even technically p _. .. ; <br />In establishing the proper numerical • speed limit in maximum zones - <br />more attention should be paid to changes in road conditions. However, <br />• in practice maximum speed limits are set sane hatnhighirgthan prima <br />_.facie limits to minimize the number, of up n downe reangnabae or <br />_Where roadway conditions warrant .slower Speeds, appropriate warning bless. <br />prudent rule prevails, supplemented by p • <br />In Idinnesota, both prima-facie and maximum type speed limits are found .' <br />tli, but. The. . <br />in -the law.: Prima facie is •the'general,rule in rural areas, but maximum - <br />limits are used on specific State.Highways designated-by. <br />55 mph <br />in municipalitiest,eallospeed limitS arelmaximum ..soUnderstandably,t� a maximum <br />:Within <br />confusion reigns in the minds of.some motorists, while others drive on <br />oblivious to restraints or opporturilties provide <br />From the-standpoint of enforcement and becommumclimitsesince the end <br />speed tolerances for both p <br />result is the same, i.e., reasonable assurance of a conviction without <br />a hassle when a citation is made 30 m h limit' <br />H Chapter 169 14, Speed Restrictions, provides fora statutory p <br />in urban districts, but does not make .a distinction between "Local" <br />residential- streets and•tiigher standard '.'Arterials ". Thus, with h the <br />usual-5 mph enforcement tolerance operating sp en _ ds can approach 35 mph.' <br />-that kindaofsspeed.:•TheY areVnarrow,efull ofaparked cars, and we an have parents even allow their children to play in the street. • <br />noted that on p - . <br />Conditions er local and different speededimets�arerwarrantedthose <br />on: the arterials, <br />.What can be done ? - Following are several alternatives, some feasible and <br />some not so feasible: - _ (.'. asible. <br />1. Eliminate the use of speed tolerances - cesstistrinto probably not not feasible. <br />_ <br />The tolerances are useful in many <br />varying street-conditions. If tolerances were eli mated aost at. <br />• deal of specific speed zoning would b_ necessary, <br />`'I: of erecting and maintaining speed signs would be monumental. <br />Return steed zoning authority to the municipal officials c - this <br />of speed traps: Additionally,•the cost of providing speed is <br />�� <br />a so not. rea:1bl2 un1e`ss we want to re-turn to e l da signs <br />g <br />would be prohibitive. .Blanket speeds limits could_be established <br />46- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.