Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 4, 2006 <br />commercial properties. The Legislature's solution was to phase out the <br />limited market value and reverse the Cax shift back to residential acrd <br />vacation properties. This resulted in significant increases in the values of <br />these properties. Given that valuation increases for 2006 and 2007 were <br />expected to be exCreme, the Legislature rolled back and extended the <br />phase-out program, spreading valuation increases ouC Co 2010. <br />The Finance Director noted that the extension of the phase-out proved to <br />be very helpful to cities where many homes still had significant gaps <br />between Che market values of their homes and limited market values. This <br />extension has helped Co continue to shelter many taxpayers from incurring <br />Che full tax impact of the increased values of their property. The Director <br />reported that in 2006, 63% of Little Canada homes were limited to a 15% <br />increase in value. Without the extension of the phase-out program, many <br />of these homes would have seen a market value increase of over 15%. <br />The County has indicated that for 2007 48% of homes will see a 0-15°l0 <br />increase in market value, 47% will see a 15% increase, and 5% will see an <br />over 15% increase. This would indicate that the gap between estimated <br />markeC value and limited markeC value is shrinking. <br />The Director then used three LitCle Canada residential properties as <br />examples showing the impacts of Che phase-out of the limited market <br />value program. <br />The Director next reviewed 2006 City Tax Rankings, noting that of the <br />Ramsey County cities, Little Canada is the 7°' lowest of 19 cities. Based <br />on the proposed 2007 Budget, Little Canada is 8'h lowest of the 19 <br />Ramsey County cites. It was pointed out that Little Canada reversed <br />rankings with the City of North SC. Paul, which receives approximately <br />$1.5 million in Local Govermnent Aid (LGA), including a $250,000 <br />increase for 2007, while Little Canada receives none. The City <br />Administrator reported that LGA awards are based on a formula. Most <br />suburban Ramsey County cities receive no LGA. The Administrator felt <br />Chat given the State's projected budget surplus and the potential to increase <br />aid Co cities, LitCle Canada should be concerned abouC how this aid will be <br />allocated. Blesener noted that the $1.5 million in LGA thaC North St. Paul <br />receives is about 75% of Little Canada's levy. The Director reported ChaC <br />the City's 2007 tax rate ranking will decrease from 21.373 to 21.155, a <br />1.02% decrease. <br />The Director compared 2006 and 2007 tax levies, noting an increase in the <br />Gross Levy for 2007 of 3.03% and in the Net Levy of 2.86°l0. It was noted <br />that Fiscal Disparities increases for 2007 to $245,820, reversing a three <br />year trend of decreases. The Director also pointed ouC that this proposed <br />levy includes the Council's directive to use $30,000 of the 2006 surplus to <br />