Laserfiche WebLink
Little Canada Planning Commission <br />9 February 1987 <br />' Page Two <br />The applicant's signs would be non - conforming in height, area, and number of <br />freestanding signs. In addition, no signs may move or rotate, as does one <br />of the applicant's freestanding signs. Gasoline price signs are considered <br />informational signs and are exempted from certain restrictions, however, they <br />may have no business identification on them. Currently, the freestanding <br />sign which rotates is also utilized as a gas price sign. <br />Variances, by ordinance direction, are to be considered on the basis of hardship. <br />Included in the criteria for variance approval are stipulations that the variance <br />may not confer a special privilege denied to other properties in the district, <br />or that denial of such a variance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly <br />enjoyed by other properties. The City has been consistent in the application of <br />the Sign Ordinance restrictions to new development, as well as to buildings <br />requesting changes in sign plans. A case in point is the recent McDonald's appli- <br />cation for a larger sign, exceeding ordinance height limitations. The City denied <br />that variance due to the lack of physical hardship and adherence to ordinance <br />standards. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is our recommendation that the sign variances be denied on the basis that the <br />requests do not conform to the ordinance standards for commercial signage and <br />there is no hardship present to allow a variance, as defined by the Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br />cc: Joe Chlebeck <br />Tom Sweeney <br />John Palacio <br />Don Carley <br />Robert Sherlock <br />page 12 <br />