My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1987 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
02-25-1987 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2013 9:31:10 AM
Creation date
5/7/2013 9:30:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Little Canada Planning Commission <br />9 February 1987 <br />' Page Two <br />The applicant's signs would be non - conforming in height, area, and number of <br />freestanding signs. In addition, no signs may move or rotate, as does one <br />of the applicant's freestanding signs. Gasoline price signs are considered <br />informational signs and are exempted from certain restrictions, however, they <br />may have no business identification on them. Currently, the freestanding <br />sign which rotates is also utilized as a gas price sign. <br />Variances, by ordinance direction, are to be considered on the basis of hardship. <br />Included in the criteria for variance approval are stipulations that the variance <br />may not confer a special privilege denied to other properties in the district, <br />or that denial of such a variance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly <br />enjoyed by other properties. The City has been consistent in the application of <br />the Sign Ordinance restrictions to new development, as well as to buildings <br />requesting changes in sign plans. A case in point is the recent McDonald's appli- <br />cation for a larger sign, exceeding ordinance height limitations. The City denied <br />that variance due to the lack of physical hardship and adherence to ordinance <br />standards. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is our recommendation that the sign variances be denied on the basis that the <br />requests do not conform to the ordinance standards for commercial signage and <br />there is no hardship present to allow a variance, as defined by the Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br />cc: Joe Chlebeck <br />Tom Sweeney <br />John Palacio <br />Don Carley <br />Robert Sherlock <br />page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.