Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes Spa:dal <br />Meeting 10 /30/72 <br />Becker <br />Cont. <br />PACE 2 <br />3. If the proposed road is taken on the <br />lots,which face Edgerton between Co. Rd. D <br />and Allen, the proposal will be effected <br />as follows: <br />A. The lots to the West will be larger. <br />B. Easements will be obtained with less <br />difficulty. <br />4. When does the Village acquire the land. <br />A. In the Becker case, we are requesting <br />a set back of 90 ft if the road is on <br />all of his property. ( or 60 ft) <br />B. Will it be by condirnation 7 <br />It was the opinion of the Village attorney that the Village <br />has the power to adope road plans. The Village can acquire such easements <br />by negotiate or'condinnation. <br />It must be noted that sooner or later the proposed road on <br />the Oliver Becker property will have to be purchased, since were are <br />requesting a set back based on the proposed Rd. system. <br />During the discussion it was pointed out by the Building <br />inspector, that he was of the opinion that the proposed Rd. in <br />sec 5 between Edgerton and Vanderbie was already changed by the <br />engineer. <br />During the discussion it was noted that the fisrt hearing <br />on the proposed road plan only pertained to a area between La Rd and <br />Co. Rd. D. and between Edgerton and Arcade St. <br />It was sugessted to Mr Becker that the Council could consider <br />a 60 ft set back. <br />It was also suggested that the matter be tabled until the <br />clerk returns with the minutes pertaining to the first hearing on the <br />thoraughfare. <br />Upon the motion of Mr. Rudy and seconded by Mr. Anderson, <br />the matter was tabled, until the clerk returns. <br />Ayes, Messrs: Anderson, Rudy,...De Bace, Chlebeck and Makeeff <br />Nayes 0, motion carried. <br />DURING THE ABSENCES OF THE CLERK, THE ATTORNY TOOK THE MINUTES. <br />Page 37 <br />