Laserfiche WebLink
northwest 2ssociatec consLlt2nts, inc. <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Little Canada Planning Commission <br />FROM: Stephen Grittman <br />DATE: 7 April 1987 <br />RE: Strohbeen /DuCharme Lot Split <br />FILE NO: 758.09 - 87.18 <br />QED <br />APR 8 1981 <br />CITY OF <br />LITTLE CANADA <br />Background <br />Ms. Laurie Strohbeen and Ms. Therese DuCharme have applied for a Subdivision <br />on peyrfromtthe0rear8ofe930aWestwrind, add t would take a <br />property in of Rod. Te in questiion, <br />pro <br />tenertsty <br />posal s will be e treated asraeconcepttproposal ats this rtime,no survey, the pro - <br />Analysis <br />Exhibit meet the l Ordinance requirment oft 75 feet pofp lot dwidth at the intended <br />the setbackline. <br />to <br />The southern most lot narrows, however, then enlarges at the rear. The intent <br />become be to large not clear from rprior staff <br />meetings app <br />existnand are plannedltoabesmaintained that Thecurrently <br />pro- <br />posal would call for the existing garage being removed. <br />As a Pis applica- <br />ti a result, one of berremoved process Planned nedlinit <br />Dion. minter (1) <br />discouraged as the proposal does not <br />Development is processed to allow two principal uses and structures on a <br />Beetle lot. The later PUD option is highly wh applicants a new standards n <br />meet the intent of option nwouldigrivesthe encourage higher house i <br />of site design. <br />exchange for the removal of an existing one. <br />Page 41 <br />crp Inn. minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 9Z5 -9420 <br />