My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-1987 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
07-22-1987 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2013 2:17:24 PM
Creation date
5/7/2013 2:16:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:Little Canada City Council <br />14 July 1987 <br />Page Two <br />The Thunder Bay TIF District has the potential of generating between $400,000 and <br />$500,000 over the life of the district. A case can be made that those funds <br />could be better used by the City to encourage other development, rather than <br />returning then to the County, School District and City for distribution under the <br />normal tax policy. . <br />In order to accomplish this goal of using the surplus funds whenever the oppor- <br />tunity presents itself, we would have to make a major change in the Development <br />District boundaries. <br />Presently, there exists seven different municipal development districts. Thunder Bay <br />would be the eighth. Tax increment funds can be utilized anywhere within its <br />development district. The procedure to accomplish our goal would be to: <br />1. Abolish all seven previous development districts. This is not a problem <br />because no TIF districts were ever established in any of these districts. <br />2. Create one large district that includes all the property formerly included <br />in the eight separate districts. <br />3. Establish Thunder Bay as TIF District #1. <br />We would have to create a new development district plan and hold a public hearing. <br />The TIF District #1 is acceptable as is, but would require the new public hearing <br />as well due to it being in a new development district. <br />Ms. Ippel approved this format change and use of surplus TIF funds. <br />The City need not capture all of the increment. You could elect to return a portion <br />to the County, School District and City. This could help answer potential critics <br />who point out the rising cost of police, fire, schools, etc. The TIF statutes have <br />partially addressed this problem by requiring the frozen base to increase annually <br />by a five year average annual adjustment factor. In this project, the County has <br />established the adjustment factor to be 1.3 %. <br />The City would be able to accumulate the funds for four years before they must be <br />utilized for some eligible project. If there were none, the City would simply <br />return the funds. <br />The proposed structuring change is a very aggressive use of TIF. It does depart <br />from the philosophy of utilizing funds for projects which create them or for similar <br />or like projects. Some critics of TIF would object to using TIF funds generated <br />by a single family residential subdivision on an industrial project across town. <br />I believe Mr. Voto will be present at your meeting of July 22nd to encourage your <br />support for restructuring the project. I too will be in attendance. I would <br />have no objections to such a change. <br />Page 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.