Laserfiche WebLink
s ,.,-pac.n �1 <br />JUN 10 1981 <br />CITY OF <br />LITTL ^tE'Gw_ <br />MINNEAPOLIS <br />PATRICK J. O'CONNOR <br />JOE S A <br />MA V�4ELLER N <br />ROBERT` JE NRISTIIANSON, JP <br />JAMES R. OORSEY <br />ANOREW J. SHEA <br />yitLt.tAM R. <br />R. COMMERS M. CARNIVAL <br />JAMES A4 RU ENSTE N <br />JAMES R. 5NERAN <br />JOHN ROBERT AUBRUNiG R <br />OCL O s. 9Uq FLYNN <br />!AMES O'MEARA <br />(9N C. <br />DOUGLAS <br />TNOM35 0. CREIGHTON <br />NICK <br />ROBERT Y0. 5T RAUGRN <br />RENOE A.O MOLONEY <br />DAviD TTHE000RET<, URBER <br />RICHARD L EVANSw15SEN <br />76UBNSVILLEI EA0`A OflICE <br />990 (555 NAL PLAZA BUILDING <br />1001 E. HIGHAY 1 <br />BVRNSVILL E.A'3 NNESOTA 55337 <br />16121 8840246 <br />ROBERT /.. SC MMEELZER <br />JOHN W. • O MIi2GER*LO <br />AVO• NNCMER5 ON•IIENRY <br />REALLY <br />MONACO J + TIA N <br />VE N ALN <br />EN8U PG <br />MANN iYOT <br />ROBERT B JASNOWA8 DRA <br />G. STREHLOW <br />STO8V TORENN URAX <br />MARY J MICHA CL P. CRAY <br />/VAN HOLSTONaNNON <br />SPECIAL COUNSEL <br />WIL DAIRi N 91 <br />4ELL 918197099 <br />C <br />DIRECT DIAL NUMBER <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />RE: <br />O'CONNOR SL HANNAN <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />3800 IDS CENTER <br />80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -2254 <br />1612) 341 -3800 <br />TELEX 29 -0584 <br />TELECOPIER 16121343-1256 <br />INCLUOING THE FORMER FIRM MACINTOSH & COMMERS <br />SUTE4*001CC O <br />,700 L3NC0LN STREET LCR <br />03'4847 <br />3031E830 1700 <br />OAVIO SURUHGAME• <br />ROBERT w1EGAN011• <br />WASHINGTON OFFICE ME0 1000O4FIC( <br />WAW <br />WASHINGTON, 0C.20008'3483 43/.3/000 SPAIN <br />1202 0873400 TELEX 23543 <br />OOC CONNSC „ <br />OAV10 JC. TR CEN' <br />JOSEPHA O <br />E. DLLON <br />MEMORANDUM <br />FRAN4 .3. WIPOA• <br />5 B <br />RICI1. 0 CONNOR <br />COWARO W BROOIIE' <br />11. o09E NT oALPEE,`R <br />O 09 R. <br />MELIINCOE4• <br />RICHARD S'MOROSC- <br />Tl.IOMAS R. JOLL<• <br />BARR. .0 T ER• <br />PCTPIC4 C. O'OONNELL' <br />JOSEPH H. 9LATCHEORP <br />JOHN Mµ COED <br />JAMES J. ES <br />I0OTHYOM `Mt' <br />miHAEL E. v• <br />CHRISTOPHERC DE COURSCN• <br />MICHAEL J. 7ERRELL• <br />1448VERM. BERLINER• <br />TAL047 C BO <br />0E c EGO5• <br />RICHARD 0 NLAMM <br />` <br />G BEF< E. HARDV•A. J . <br />O▪ AMESJw.SlMINOTON• <br />0141ME7 9(00N57(1N• <br />P ETER M 4AR2ON• <br />EMILY R. ANOREW A OASOEBICRI• <br />RACHEL O ♦RCVS• <br />TIMOTHY wLJENKIN S' <br />` ALGARY • P.. DPNEL• <br />L(GISLATI Cc O gSULTANT <br />mART LCGIBLATIVC COOROINATOR <br />MICHAEL COLOPY• <br />WILLIAM T.HANNAN 59.3911'19951 <br />AM- ES A.CNATIONS• <br />OAV,D C. RODS• <br />DAV10 A 2155EP <br />•NOT MEMBER or MINNESOTA BAR <br />City Administrators, City Managers and City <br />Clerks of the North Suburban Cable Commission <br />Thomas D. Creighton, Legal Counsel <br />cv <br />4 <br />June 9, 1987 <br />Amendments to Joint Powers Agreement <br />The North Suburban Cable Commission ( "Commission ") has <br />adopted a resolution recommending certain amendments to the <br />Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of a <br />Cable Communications System, to which your City is currently <br />a member. The proposed amendments to the Agreement relate to <br />the voting structure of the Commission and the financial <br />contributions to the Commission of each Member City. <br />The existing Agreement established the voting rights of <br />each Member City on the basis of the number of dwelling units <br />in the municipality represented by a director. The Agreement <br />provides that three years after the inception of the Commission, <br />or after the second annual report of the number of subscribers <br />to the cable system, whichever occurred sooner, the voting structure <br />of the Commission may be reconstituted to represent one vote <br />per director based upon subscribers, provided that each director <br />has at least one vote. Accordingly, the Commission undertook <br />to study alternative methods of structuring the voting provisions <br />of the Agreement based upon subscribers, while at the same time <br />maintaining an equivalent proportion to the current voting structure. <br />Attached is a graph depicting the Commission's recommended <br />revision to the voting structure. As can be seen, each director <br />will be entitled to vote in proportion to the percent of annual <br />Page 69 <br />