Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />April 22, 1987 <br />Boosalis <br />(Cont.) <br />Knox <br />Lumber PUD <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 8 <br />Scalze reported that the Park Commission is recommending that <br />park dedication be in cash rather than land as provided for under <br />the ordinance. <br />Collova asked why a ponding area would be required as well as a <br />cash park dedication. <br />Scalze indicated that the issues of ponding and park dedication <br />are separate ones. <br />Fahey agreed.that the development was required to provide on -site <br />ponding. <br />The Engineer reported that he submitted a letter recommending that <br />at this time the area be held for drainage purposes. <br />Blesener pointed out the amount of run -off this development would <br />add considering the roof area as well as blacktopped areas. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 87 -4 -156 - GRANTING CONCEPT <br />APPROVAL TO THE BOOSALIS REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT AND PUD SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS <br />OF THE CITY PLANNER AS CONTAINED IN HIS APRIL 2, 1987 <br />REPORT AND IN THE ABSENCE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br />FOR THIS PROPOSAL IN LIGHT OF THE PROPOSAL MEETING <br />CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS LEAVING OPEN THE QUESTION <br />OF THE GREEN AREA ON THE PROPERTY AND WHETHER OR <br />NOT IT SHOULD BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY AS AN OUTLOT <br />FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES SUBJECT TO FURTHER INPUT FROM <br />THE CITY ENGINEER IN THIS REGARD, AND FURTHER <br />SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARK COMMISSION <br />THAT THE PARK CHARGE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT BE IN <br />CASH RATHER THAN LAND AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER CITY <br />ORDINANCE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Pages 169 and 170. <br />Fahey reported that the Knox Lumber PUD request was recently tabled <br />by the Planning Commission as no one was present from Knox to <br />present the proposal. Once a matter is tabled by the Planning <br />Commission, it has 60 days in which to act on the proposal before <br />the Council can take action. <br />Joseph Jamison, representing Knox, reported that the notice they <br />received did not indicate that they were to attend the Planning <br />Commission meeting. <br />Page 76 <br />