My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1981 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
10-28-1981 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2013 2:31:30 PM
Creation date
5/13/2013 2:29:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
01,NESOzq <br />o <br />Fy <br />Op TRP <br />Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation <br />District 9 <br />3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 2050 <br />North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 <br />(612) 7702311 - <br />October 9, 1981 <br />Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck, Clerk <br />515 Little Canada Road <br />Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 <br />In reply please refer to: 319 <br />C.S. 6214 (TH 49 -Rice St. at Demont Ave.) <br />Traffic Signal Study <br />Dear Mr. Chelbeck: <br />In response to your letter, requesting a traffic signal study at T.H. 49 <br />and Demont, we have completed a study of volumes, accidents, and intersection <br />operation. Based on the study, we conclude that a signal is not justified. <br />Data collected nationwide and in Minnesota indicates the improper installation <br />of a traffic signal could increase the total number of accidents and increase <br />total motorist delay. To decrease the possibility of increasing accident <br />rates and motorist delays associated with traffic signal installations and <br />to gain maximum benefits, a series of warrants justifying signal installa- <br />tions have been developed. These warrants consist of time delays of <br />motor vehicles, accidents and volumes of traffic. Traffic signals should <br />not be installed until these warrants are met. <br />Based on traffic volumes, the intersection does not justify signalization. <br />Traffic volumes would have to increase considerably on Demont Avenue. The <br />need to install a traffic signal, based on volumes, appears to be several <br />years away. <br />In reviewing accident history, we did not see any major accident problem. <br />The majority of the accidents that have occurred over the past three years <br />are not of the type normally considered to be correctable by a traffic <br />signal. Also, comparing the number of accidents and and accident rates <br />of this intersection to similar signalized intersections, the present values <br />are lower. Therefore, the accident rate would not be expected to decrease <br />if a signal were installed. Based on experience, it would probably increase. <br />We appreciate the City's concern and will continue to make periodic traffic <br />counts and will monitor the intersection. Again, at this time, the need to <br />signalize still appears to be several years away. <br />Sincerely, <br />Mark R. Wikelius, P.E. <br />District Traffic Engineer <br />28 <br />An Equal Opportunity Employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.