HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-09-1981 Council AgendaAGENDA
- 1ST - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTH
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
SEPT -9 -81
1. 7:30 Call to Order. Tape no. to
2. Roll Call: Mayor Raymond Hanson
Councilman Michael Fahey
Councilwoman Beverly Scalze
Councilman Dennis Forsberg
Councilwoman Muggs Nardini
City Attorney Clayton Parks
Consulting Engineer,Donald Carley
City Clerk, Joseph Chlebeck
Recording Secry. Kathy Glanzer
3. Approval of Minutes Tape no. to
Meeting Aug. -26- 1981
Motion by: 2nd by
Ayes Mayes
Page -1-
Agenda
Little Canada
City Council Meeting
Sept. -9 -81- Continued.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. AMENDING ORDINANCE 164 -( Subdivision Ord) Sec. 1006- 030(p) Tape no.
and
AMENDING ORDINANCE 73 ( Street Construction) Sec. -2 -(c)
to permit 50 ft street - right -of -way widths
in certain areas.
TIME SCHEDULED- 7:30
SEE CORRESPONDENCE:
Page -4- Notice of Hearing.
Page -3- Planning Commission minutes. ( recommending approval)
COMMENTS - Planner - Engineer - others.
OBJECTIONS.
MOTION TO CLOSE HEARING.
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes --Nayes __�
Resolution to authorize attorney to prepare an ordinance amending ordinance
no. 164 -Sec. 1006- 030 -(p) and ordinance no. 73- Sec. -2 -(c)
Municipal Code Sec. -502 -030
Municipal Code Sec.- 501 -090
to provide for 50 ft width st.
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
Page -2-
Agenda
Little Canada City Council
Reg. Meeting
Sept.- 9- 1981,Cont.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. REVENUE SHARING ESTIMATED ALLOTMENT Tape no. to
Allotment- $ 54,537.00 (1982) ( 1981 allotment- $ 56,668.00 )
TIME SCHEDULED 7:40 ( 1982 allotment- $ 54,537.00 )
( down $ 2,298.00 )
SEE CORRESPONDENCE
Page -5- notice of publication.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE ALLOTMENT BE USED TO PAY POLICE PROTECTION.
( The city has been doing this for the last 6 years.)
OTHER COMMENTS.
MOTION TO CLOSE HEARING.
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
Resolution authorizing the proposed allotment ( $ 54,573.00) to be used in
the 1982 budget for police payment.
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
6. Continuation of the Holzschuh Plat Tape no. to
Motion to bring to table: Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
SEE CORRESPONDENCE
PAGES -1 -2- & -3- PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT.
PLANNING COMMISSION HAS TABLED THE MATTER.
SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO BE HELD ON Sept. 16
TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER WITH property owners.
WE HAVE A PETITION FROM PROPERTY OWNERS ON PAYNE AVE AGAINST THE EXTENSION OF
ALLEN AVE FROM PAYNE AVE EASTWARD.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Motion to table:
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
Page -3-
Agenda
Little Canada City Council
Meeting
Sept. -9- 1981 -Cont.
IDEMS BY REPRESENTATION
7. Peppino's Expension Tape no. to
SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGE- page -3- Planning Commission report.
PLANNER TO COMMENT.
Motion to: Approve Deny Table Refer to:
Other:
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
8. Garske House Plan. (res. 81 -8 -433)
Engineer to comment.
Other comments.
Motion to:
Motion By 2nd by
Tape No.
9. Weber : proposed Pole Bldg. Tape no. to
SEE CORRESPONDENCE Page -3- Planning Commission minutes.
PLANNER HAS REVIEWED AND WILL COMMENT.
MOTION TO:
Motion by 2nd by
9 -A- Dorthy Auger Property Divition: Tape no. to
( Takening a drive -way off one lot and adding it to another lot.
Motion to Motion by 2nd by
Page -4-
Agenda
Little Canada
City Council Meeting.
Sept. -9 -1981- Continued.
COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
10. Gagne Matter.
Mr. Gagne mentioned that he would not appear.
SEE CORRESPONDENCE:
Page -6- letter to Mr. Gagne.
Page -7- Gagne's site plan.
Tape no.
PAGES- 10 thru -13- COPIES OF THE ZONING CODE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY BLDGS.
MOTION T0:
Motion by:
Ayes
2nd by
Mayes
11. De Bace Matter.
Bob may appear or sent letter.
Tape no.
SEE CORRESPONDENCE Page -8- letter to Mr. De Bace.
Page -8 -A- Copy of building permit.
Page-9- site plan.
SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGES 10- thru -13- Zoning code accessory bldgs.
NOTE: Mr. De Bace has informed me by telephone that he intends to use
the old garage for storage. ( The old garage is a tuck - under)
Comments
MOTION TO:
Moton by: 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
Page -5-
Agenda
Little Canada Council
Meeting - Sept -9 -1981
Continued
COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
PLANNER:
11. Additional Planning Grants:
Tape no. to
12 Additional fees for zoning amendments: Tape no, to
13. Letters to: North Star ( pertaining to signs) Tape no. to
Conn -co ( pertaining to signs)
Conn -co tent sale 99999 ( tent is in parking lot what happens
to parking )
14 Planner- other.
ATTORNEY
Tape no. to
15. ORDINANCE NO. 177- Permitting on sale liquor on Sunday morning
Mr(s) introduce Ordinance no. 176
Mr(s) 2nd the adoption of ordinance no. 176.
Ayes Nayes
16. Letters to: Residence on Carla Lane pertaining to noisey party.
17. MARY HOUSE ( winter is around the cornor we may not be able to use
skating rinks if this matter is not resolved soon).
18. Attorney - other.
Page- 6 -
Agenda
Little Canada City Council
Meeting- 9 -9 -81 -Cont.
COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
ENGINEER: Tape no. to
19. TURN OVER OF DEMONT ( from Rice to 35 E) from the County to City
SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGES 14 thru- 20 -
MOTION TO:
Motion by: _2nd by
Ayes Nayes
Tape no.
20 FEASIBILITY REPORT ( EDGERTON ST. Little Canada Rd. to D)
Peition presented at last meeting was from La Bore To D.
Motion to: Call for a hearing on Oct.
Motion By: 2nd by __ Ayes Nayes
There is a meeting planned for Oct -7 -81
for deferred assessments:
Tape no.
21. Water stubs for property on the West side of Arcade St.
across from Westwind Addition.
SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGE -21- Copy of resolution no. 80-9-333 -
according to this resolution the city was to install water stubs
for - 3021 - 3025 - 3033 -3039 - Arcade.
Comments.
Motion to: Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes
23 HAMMOND LAND FILL MATTER. Tape no. to
See correspondence pages 23- thru -24-
24 Engineer other.
Page -7-
Agenda
Little Canada Council
Meeting
Sept. -9 -81
Cont.
OTHER COUNCIL MATTERS.
25. Letter from Mn Dot. Concerning signals on Demont & Rice
SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGE -25 -.
Tape no, to
•p
26 Letter from Mn Dot concerning R/R signals on
Owasso Blvd.
SEE CORRESPONDENCE ON PAGE -26-
27.
RESOLUTION NECESSARY REQUESTING PUBLIC SERVICE
COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING.
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
Tape no, to
NOTE THE CITY MAY HAVE TO PAY FOR THIS. ( $ 60,000.00 to 90,000.00 )
( in 1971 the city paid for the signals on Country Dr. Amount $ 17,000.00)(100 %)
conveyance
Tax- forfieted
Reiland Addition.
SEE CORRESPONDENCE
Tape no. to
Page- 27- letter from County Land Commissioner
Pages- 28 & 29 copy of a resolution dated Oct. -9 -74-
where the City requested that the property not be sold.
( Note the resolution did not request a state use deed)
Motion to request a state use deed and convey the property to Little Canada
for trail proposes.
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
28 SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENTS
Tape no. to
1). See correspondence page -30-
Motion to Call for a supplementary assessment hearing for
Parcel No. 53- 30500- 010 -07 in the amount of $ 1,938.60.
( the assessment did not appear in the 1980 levy collectable 1981)
Motion to call for a hearing 2nd by Ayes Nayes
2). Assessment for the Vacation of Lake St.
See Minutes Sept. -8 -1980 Res. No. 80 -9 -341. Amount ( $ 2,404.20 )
Page -8-
Agenda
Little Canada
City Council meeting
Sept. -9 -81
Cont.
COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
29. Approve payment of vouchers
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
30.
Tape no. to
Adjourn:
Motion by 2nd by
Ayes Nayes
Time adjourned
Tape no. to
Page -9-
CORRESPONDENCE TO AGENDA
LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
9 -9 -81
PAGE CONTENTS
1- thru -3- Planning Commission minutes
4 Notice of Publication- Amending Street Ordinance permitting
50 Ft. widths streets.
5 Publication- -1st Hearing Revenue sharing hearing.
6. Letter to Don Gagne.
7 Don Gagne Site Plan.
8 Letter to Robert De Bace.
9 Site Plan - De Bace.
10- thru -13 Zoning code pertaining to Accessory Buildings
14- thru -20
21
22- thru -24-
Letter from County Engineer -Turn over of Demont from
County to City.
Copy of Resolution no. 80 -9 -333
Pertaining to water stubs on the West Side of Arcade.
Respond from Hammond's attorney pertaining to the Engineer's
letter of Aug. -4- 81
25 Letter from MINN. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION (MnDot)
concerning signals on Rice & Demont.
26 Letter from Mn Dot. concerning R/R signals on Owasso.
27
28 thru -29-
Letter from Land Commission concerning State use Deed for
conveyance of tax forfieted land . ( Belland Addition)
Copy of Resolution oct -9 -1974- Declaring the above
mentioned property as non saleable.
30. Copy to Neumann- pertaining to assessment error.
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Planning Commission - City of Little Canada
Sept. 3, 1981
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Little
Canada was held on the 3rd day of Sept., 1981 at 7:35 p.m. at 515
Little Canada Rd. in said city.
The following members were present: Peter Costa, Eugene DeLonais,
Sharon Timmons, Roy French, Myers Frattalone, LeRoy LeMay, Jim Steele,
Joe Vitale.
Absent: Tom DuCharme
Also present: Brad Nielsen, Northwest Associated Consultants.
Minutes approved as read from last meeting.
DOROTHY AUGER
PROPERTY DIVISION Driveway to her home is on adjoining lot. She wants to
split the driveway off of a smaller lot and adjoin it to
larger lot. New smaller lot will be 17,805 sq. ft.
Motion made by Eugene DeLonais to recommend approval
of property division for Mrs. Auger.
Seconded by Sharon Timmons.
Motion carried 7 -0.
REVISION OF
HOLZSCHUH PLAT
Bill Bartels (Realty World Midway Realty) appeared with
a copy of new plat drawing for Hulzschuh plat.
Brad Nielsen - lots to the east were shortened so that
lots east of the development could later by developed.
Allen Ave. now deadends at Greenbrier to the east.
Brad Nielsen stated that the Holzschuh plat is roughly
outlined as follows: The area bounded by LaBore on the
south, Co Rd D on the North, Payne Ave. on the west and
a row of lots that front on Greenbrier on the east side.
The city has had requests by several owners as to how to
develop the area. The Holzschuh lots would all front on
Payne Ave.
If Holzschchs were to use all their land, it would leave
Mr. Newman with an unbuildable piece of property. The
Holzschuhs have changed the depths of the lots to 114' and
made the lots wider so they still come out to 10,000 sq.ft.
The Planners modified the Engineers road plan to address
some of the problems they saw, in regard to the NSP easement
and the amount of roads which will run from "D" to LaBore.
The Planners suggested to Mr. Holzschuh that he include
Allen Ave. on his plan just in case it is needed as a
way to get into the area -not necessarily as an indication
that Allen Ave. be extended all the way through to
Greenbrier.
Brad presented the modified plan that the planners propose.
Their plan calls for one street out the North onto D and
2 streets out the South to LaBore. The NSP easement
cannot be built on. The planners are recommending that
the city look into using the easement area(NSP easement
and possibly a small portion of the adjoining land) as
a park.
1.
PLANNING COMMISSION
page 2
9 -3 -81
HOLZSCHCH con't: The proposed roads follow property owner lines so that
owners do not have to sell part of their land to adjoining
owners to be able to develop their land.
The county ditch will have to be rerouted along lot lines
so that drainage is adequate for the area.
Don Carley explained the existing drainage system in the
area. The current county ditch runs in from the north and
curves to the east. The ditch that comes off Payne Ave. is
a private ditch and is not necessary to the drainage of the
property. There is a graded swail along the back of the
lots on the west side of Payne Ave. which will drain into
the county ditch. Mr. Carly stated that a street will cost
about $200.00 per running foot (sewer, water, concrete
curbs, etc.). Mr. Floyd Holzschuh is opposed to putting
Allen Ave. through at all. He is in favor of Mr. Carley's
plan.
Mr. Doug Peterson lives on vacated part of Allen Ave. to
the west of Payne Ave. He is opposed to Allen Ave. being
put in across the street from him. He says they have
had no problem with Payne Ave. being a long block. He
would rather see long streets through the area instead
of short cut up streets.
Mr. Don Valento and Mr. Jespersen stated that before
the Holzschuh plat was approved,theywould like the whole
street plan approved for the whole area. Mr. Valento
and Mr. Jespersen have agreed tobuy the Holzschuh out lot.
They need to know if Allen Ave. will be approved or not.
They are both against Allen Ave. coming into the property.
Brad stated that the planner cannot recommend not allowing
for Allen Ave. coming into the area. The subdivision
ordinance states that a block cannot be over ; mile long.
Motion to send back to Planner and City Engineer to try
to work out a plan which might eliminate Allen Ave. made
by LeRoy LeMay.
Discussion- Brad stated that he felt that was not necessary.
If you eliminate Allen Ave. on the planners plan, you have
a plan without Allen Ave.
Richard Holzschuh also appeared.
Mr. Valento stated that putting Allen Ave. through also
creates a drainage problem because the drainage for the
whole area runs from LaBore to D.
Seconded by Gene DeLonais.
Mr. Carley and Mr. Nielsen both felt nothing could be
accomplished by sending it back to them.
Motion denied.
Ayes -3
Nos -4
Ron Flynn appeared (owns Landin property- 15 acres).
He is in favor of Brads plan without Allen Ave.
Motion to approve the Holzschuh proposal (without Allen
Ave. being included on the plan) and including the outlot
on the east of the property as proposed made by Sharon Timmons.
Seconded by Joe Vitale.
Ayes -2 Nos- 5 Motion denied. 7
e �'
PLANNING COMMISSION
page 3
Sept. 3, 1981
HOLZSCHCH CON'T Motion to table issue until 2 weeks made by Gene DeLonais.
Seconded -LeRoy LeMay.
Motion carried 8 -0.
EXPANSION OF
PEPPINOS
The Planning Commission would like all property owners
notified of a special meeting of the Planning Commission
to be held two week from tonight. The Planner will have
different plans to hopefully settle the problem,ready by then.
Amendment to Ordinance to permit 50 ft. widths in streets:
Brad stated that, because of lot configurations, 60 ft.
wide streets are not possible. in the area. He stated
that both he and Mr. Carley are in favor of reducing
the required 60' to 50' in residential streets.
All roads on both the Planners plan and the City Engineers
plan are 50'.
Motion to recommend that the council approve to amend
Sec. 1006.030 allowing 50' minimum instead of 60' minimum
on local residential streets made by Joe Vitale.
Seconded by Jim Steele.
Motion carried 8 -0.
Addition on the west end of the building, 20' by 50'.
(1,000 sq. ft.). Six parking spaces are lost by putting
on addition.
Motion to recommend approval of addition subject to Planner
approving number of parking spaces made by Sharon Timmons.
Seconded by Roy French.
Motion carried 8 -0.
POLE BLDG.PROPOSAL Charles Webber appeared.
2962 No.Rice (on north side of Antler Corp. and apartment
building) is the address where Mr. Webber is requesting
permission to build a 24' X 40' pole building, to make
cement ornaments.
Brad stated that the use of the property cannot be added
to, without granting a variance or changing the zoning
on the property.
Motion to grant variance to construct 24' X 40' structure
( to replace 2 previously existing buildings in poor
condition) made by Roy French.
Seconded by Jim Steele.
Motion carried 8 -0.
ADJOURN Motion to adjourn by Roy French.
Seconded by Myers Frattalone.
Carried 8 -0.
Meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Sharon Timmons
Office of:
JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk
515 Little Canada Road
Little Canada, Minn. 55117
484 -2177
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA .
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
AND
STREET CONSTRUCTION
ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
MAYOR
Raymond Hanson
COUNCI L
Michael Fahey
Beverly Scalze
Dennis Forsberg
Mugs Nardinl
Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Little Canada,Minnesota,
will hold a public hearing on the,9th day of September,1981,at,7:30 o'clock P.M.
in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at,515 Little Canada Road in
said City to consider the following.
To permit 50 ft. street,right -of -way widths
in certain areas by amending,Ordinance no.
164 ( Subdivision Ord.) Sec. - 1006 - 030 -(p)
and Ordinance no. 73 ( Street Construction)
Sec. -2- (c)
All persons desering to be heard with reference to this matter will be heard
during this hearing.
Joseph G. Chlebeck
Clerk
4
Office of:
JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk
515 Little Canada Road
Little Canada, Minn. 55117
484 -2177
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
PROPOSED USE HEARING
REVENUE SHARING -1982
PROPOSED ALLOTMENT
$ 54,537.00
MAYOR
Raymond Hanson
COUNCIL_
Michael Fahey
Beverly Scalze
Dennis Forsberg
Mugs Nardini
Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Little Canada,Minnesota,
will hold a public hearing on the,9th day of September,1981, at 7:40 o'clock P.M.
in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at,515 Little Canada Road in
said city to consider the following.
Discuss proposed uses for General Revenue Sharing
purposes for all interested citizens of Little
Canada.
The amount of General Revenue Sharing funds to
be discussed for 1982 is $ 54,537.00
All interested citizens will have the opportunity to give written and oral comments
on uses of the funds. Senior Citizens are encouraged to attended and comment.
5
w
Joseph G. Chlebeck
Clerk
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Office of:
JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk
515 Little Canada Road
Little Canada, Minn. 55117
484 -2177
August 28, 1981
Mi. Don Gagne
2828 Condit
. Little Canada, Mn 55117
Dear Mr. Gagne,
MAYOR
Raymond Hanson
COUNCI L
Michael Fahey
Beverly Scelze
Dennis Forsberg
Mugs Nardini
• -Because you failed to apply for and recieve a building permit
prior to construction start, and because the City of.Little Canada's
ordinance # 166, effective June 25, 1980 requires a Conditional
Use Permit for more than one garage, I am hereby ordering you
to halt any construction activity on the structures on your property
effective on the date of your receipt of this notice.
Application for a Conditional Use Permit must be made to and approved
by the City Council. Please contact me if youlhave any questions
on this matter.
Sincerely,
��
L. E. Squires c
Building Inspector
LES:gb
cc: Council
Clerk
6
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Office of:
JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk
515 Little Canada Road
Little Canada, Minn. 55117
484 -2177
August 28, 1981
Mr. Robert DeBace
81 Bryan Ave.
Little Canada, Mn 55117
Dear Mr. DeBace,
MAYOR
Raymond Hanson
COUNCIL
Michael Fahey,
Beverly Scaize
Dennis Forsberg
Mugs Nardini
'Because you failed to apply for and recieve a building permit
prior to construction start, and because the City of.Little Canada's
ordinance # 166, effective June 25, 1980 requires a Conditional
Use Permit for more than one garaga I am hereby ordering you
to halt any construction activity on the structures on your property
effective on the date of your receipt of this notice.
Application for a Conditional Use Permit must be made to and approved
by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions
on this matter.
Sincerely,
. `�S.dSi c�- rrrz.e -o�
L. E. Squires
Building Inspector
LES:gb
cc: Council
Clerk
eog
8
w
z
0
0
CITY- , TTL! C A ?A
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, Minnesota 55117
484 -2177
BUILDING PERMIT NO
Name
Address
City
Zip
•
Tel.'No...
Name
Address
City
Zip
• Tel, No.
C.) CC
W w
1— w
Z
20
cr UZ
d
Name
Address
City
Zip
Tel. No,
Registration Number
Structure
Used A •
Zone
DEMOLISH
r,
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
Permit Fee
State Surcharge
Plan Check Fee
SAC Charge (Units)
Sewer
Water
Park •
Other •
Penalty
TOTAL FEE PAID
Receipt No. • Date
•
ALTER • REPAIR
BUILD • ADD •
•
MOVE
WIDTH
DEPTH • • I SIDE YARD /SETBACK
LOT
SETBACK
SIZE' •
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA Little Canada, Minn. 55
JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, City Clerk — 515 Little Canada Road, 66 //
RECEIPT
7No g142
TIMATED.VALUE
.9
z
FORSURCHARGE
J
i
r
W
Dollars $
CC
0
LL
Account No.
Amount
Amount
. tx -,com wNE157H IS
Pnnr- ^n7J19W YHE SAME TO BE TRUE AND •
C(5 RECT ALL PROVISION OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES •
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH-.
WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A . •
PERMIT--DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO
VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER
STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE
PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
•
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE).
•
SIGNA1 LIRE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER), •
PERMIT ISSUED
(DATE)
BUILDING OFFICIAL
(DATE)
•
•
•
Iona....
No. of .
Dwelling Units
'.Fire Sprinklers
Required (Yes ONo
OFF STREET PARKING SPACES: •
Covered .• Uncovered
Special Approvals •
Required
Received...?
• . Nol Requiroa.
BOARD OF APPEALS
PLANNING COMM.
VILLAGE COUNCIL
SPECIAL USE.
q -4
NUMBER
STREET
LOT
BLOCK
. ADDITION OR TRACT
LEGAL)TFSCRIPTInN -.
WIDTH
DEPTH • • I SIDE YARD /SETBACK
LOT
SETBACK
SIZE' •
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA Little Canada, Minn. 55
JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, City Clerk — 515 Little Canada Road, 66 //
RECEIPT
7No g142
TIMATED.VALUE
.9
z
FORSURCHARGE
J
i
r
W
Dollars $
CC
0
LL
Account No.
Amount
Amount
. tx -,com wNE157H IS
Pnnr- ^n7J19W YHE SAME TO BE TRUE AND •
C(5 RECT ALL PROVISION OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES •
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH-.
WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A . •
PERMIT--DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO
VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER
STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE
PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
•
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE).
•
SIGNA1 LIRE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER), •
PERMIT ISSUED
(DATE)
BUILDING OFFICIAL
(DATE)
•
•
•
Iona....
No. of .
Dwelling Units
'.Fire Sprinklers
Required (Yes ONo
OFF STREET PARKING SPACES: •
Covered .• Uncovered
Special Approvals •
Required
Received...?
• . Nol Requiroa.
BOARD OF APPEALS
PLANNING COMM.
VILLAGE COUNCIL
SPECIAL USE.
q -4
2,i, 11
...
6,1
a- gix 7' GA-rA2E-
1 1
1
[
bp/ipq_
tr
oo
)4oS
9
A-
I
L. Any proposed structure which will, under this Ordinance, become non - conforming but For which a
building permit has been lawfully granted prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, may be
completed in accordance with the approved plans; provided construction is started within sixty (60)
days of the effective date of this Ordinance, is not abandoned for a period of more than one hundred
twenty (120) days, and continues to completion within two (2) years. Such structure and use shall
thereafter be a legally non- conforming structure and use. _
903.020. GENERAL BUILDING AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section of the Zoning Ordinance is to establish aenerol development
performance standards. These standards are intended and designed to assure compatibility of uses;
to prevent urban blight, deterioration and decay; and to enhance the health, safety and general
welfare of the residents of the community.
B. Dwelling Unit Restriction.
1. No cellar, basement, garage, tent, accessory building or recreational vehicle shall at any
time be used as an independent residence or dwelling unit, temporarily or permanently.
2. Basements may be used as living quarters or rooms as a portion of residential dwellings.
3. Tents, play houses or similar structures may be used for ploy or recreational purposes.
C. Platted and Unplatted Property.
1 Any person desiring to improve property shall submit to the Building Official a survey of said
premises and information on the location and dimensions of existing and proposed buildings,
location of easements crossing the property, encroachments, and any other information which
may be necessary to insure conformance to City Ordinances.
2. All buildings shall be so placed so that they will not obstruct future streets which may be
constructed by the City in conformity with existing streets and according to the system and
standards employed by the City.
3. Except in the case of planned unit development as provided For in Section 923 of this Ordinance,
not more than one (1) principal building shall be located an a lot.
4. On a through lot (a lot fronting on two (2) parallel streets), both street lines shall be front lot
lines for applying the yard and parking regulations of this Ordinance.
D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Equipment.
1. An accessory building shall be considered an integral part of the principal building if it is
connected to the principal building by a covered passoge.way.
2. Except for farm buildings, no accessory buildings shall be erected or located within any required
yard other than the rear yard.
3. Except for farm buildings, accessory buildings and garages shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in
height and shall be five (5) feet or more from all lot lines of adjoining lots, shall be six (6)
feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot and shall not be located within
a utility easement.
4. No accessory building or garage for single family dwellings shall occupy more than twenty -five
(25) percent of a rear yard, nor exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor area, except
by conditional use permit as provided for in Section 921 of this Ordinance.
17
LU
E. Drainage
lans shall be submitted to s the City Eungineerf for'lhis reviews and the final drainage plan tshall be r subject to his written approval.
F. Fences - General Requirements.
1 • Permit Required. No person, firm or corporation shall construct or erect any fence without first
securing a building permit.
2. Locations. All Fences shall be located entirely upon the property of the fence owner unless the
owner of the adjoining property agrees, in writing, that such fence may be erected on the property
line of the respective properties.
3. Surveys. The City Building Officialjna require an applicant for a fence permit to establish his
true boundary line by a survey thereof to be mode by a Registered Land Surveyor.
5. No permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one (1) private garage structure for
each detached single family dwelling, except on the approval of a conditional use permit
according to the provisions of Section 921 of this Ordinance. Every detached single family
dwelling unit erected after the effective date of this Ordinance shall be so located on the lot
so that at least a two (2) car garage, either attached or detached, can be located on said lot.
6. Outdoor swimming pools with a capacity of fifteen hundred (1,500) gallons or with a depth of
three (3) Feet or more of water shall be fenced in compliance with F., 6. of this Section.
4. Construction and Maintenance. Every fence shall be constructed in a substantial, workmanlike
manner and of material reasonably suited for the purpose for which the fence is proposed to be used.
Every fence shall be maintained in such condition as to not become a hazard, eyesore or public or
private nuisance. All fences shall be so constructed that the finished side faces away from the
fence owner's lot. Any fence which endangers the public safety, health or welfare shall be con-
sidered a public nuisance and abatement proceedings may be instituted by the proper City Official
within
to hit (15) days
the after
uisances Link fences, where permitted sshalltbe�const constructed suchsary
a manner that no barbed ends shall be at the top.
5. Prohibited Fences. Electric fences shall not be permitted, Barbed wire fences shall not be
permitted except as hereinafter provided. Fences of the picket, rail or slat types shall be so
constructed that the spaces between the pickets, rails or slats shall not constitute a condition
which may be a dangerous attraction to children.
6. Required Fences - Swimming Pools. Outdoor swimming pools as described in D., 6. of this
Section shall be adequately fenced to prevent uncontrolled access from the street or adjacent
property.
a. A fence at least four (4) feet in height shall completely enclose any underground pool,
and except as specifically provided in b. below, shall completely enclose any pool
constructed above ground.
b. The fence required in a. above shall not be required for any pool constructed above ground
which is equipped with a detachable ladder or a ladder which manually can be placed
in a position where access to the pool cannot be obtained by use of any such ladder.
7. Residential District Fences.
a. Boundary Line Fences. In all parts of Little Canada, zoned residential (farms excepted
no boundary line Fences shall exceed three and ors -half (3 1.12) feet in height except
that:
io
11.
I
905. "R -1 ", SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
905.010, PURPOSE. The purpose of the "R-1", Single Family Residential District is to provide for low density
single family detached residential dwelling units and directly related, complementary uses.
905,020. PERMITTED USES.
A.
B.
Single family detached dwellings.
Family Day Care. Restricted to a family dwelling in which foster care, supervision and training for
children of school or pre - school age out of their own home is provided during port of a day (less than
twenty -four (24) hours) with no overnight accommodations or facilities and children are delivered and
removed daily. The number to be cared for in one (1) day care home shall not exceed Five (5) including
the family's own non - school age children. The regulations and conditions of the Minnesota Department
of Public Welfare, Public Welfare Manual 11 3130 as adopted, amended and /or changed shall be
satisfactorily met and a written indication of preliminary, pending or final license approval from the
regulatory welfare agency shall be supplied to the City.
C. Essential services.
D. Fanning and agricultural related buildings and structures subject to Minnesota Pollution Control
Standards, but not including commercial feed lots or other commercial operations,
905,030. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES.
A. Private garages, parking spaces and carports for licensed and operable passenger can and trucks not
to exceed a gross weight of twelve thousand (12,000) pounds, as regulated by Section 903.050 (off- street
Parking) of this Ordinance. Private garages are intended for use to share the private passenger vehicles
of the family or families resident upon the premises, and in which no business service or industry is
carried on. Such space can be rented to non - residents of the property for private passenger vehicles
and /or non - commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off - street parking in full compli-
ance with this Ordinance is provided elsewhere on the property. Such garage shall not be used for
the storage of more than one (1) commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling unit.
B. Storage of recreational vehicles and recreational equipment.
C. Horne occupations.
D. Non - commercial greenhouses and conservatories.
E. Swimming pool, tennis courts and other recreational facilities which are operated for the enjoyment and
convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests.
F. Tool houses, sheds and similar buildings for storage of domestic supplies and non - commercial recreational
equipment.
G. Boarding or renting of rooms to not more than two (2) persons.
H. Agricultural equipment.
905.040, CONDITIONAL USES. (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and
regulated by Section 921 of this Ordinance.)
A. Two - family dwelling units provided that:
Adequate off - street parking and access is provided in compliance with Section 903.050 of
this Ordinance.
2. The ratio of two family dwellings to single family dwellings in a single block shall not exceed 1:10
42
12
3. Two (2) or more two family dwellings shall not abut one another.
4. Requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code are complied with.
5. The provisions of Section 921.010, E of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met.
6. Two family condominium dwellings shall meet the requirements of Section 923.
8. Public regulated utility buildings and i'T uctures necessary for the health, safety and ge ne -c! welfare
of the community, provided that:
1. Conformity with the surrounding neighborhood is maintained and required setbacks or side yard
requirements are met.
2.
Equipment is completely enclosed in a permanent structure with no outside storage.
3. Adequate screening from neighboring uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with
Section 903.020, G of this Ordinance.
C. Farm Buildings within three hundred (300) feet of an existing residence or residential platted lot provided
that:
l • The provisions of Section 921.010, E of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met.
D. Residential planned unit development as regulated by Section 923 of this Ordinance.
905.050. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an
"R -1" District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Ordinance.
A. Lot Area - Interior: 10,000 square feet
Corner: 11,000 square Feet
8. Lot Width - Interior: 75 feet
Corner: 80 feet
C. Setbacks:
Front Yards: Not less than thirty (30) feet.
2. Side Yards: Any lots platted and developed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance or for
which a building permit has been issued shall have side yards no less than five (5) feet. Other
lots shall have side yards no less than ten (10) feet, nor less than thirty (30) feet on the side yard
abutting a public right- of -wcy.
3. Rear Yards: Not less than thirty (30) Feet.
905.060. BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.
A. Height. No structure shall exceed two and one -half (2 1/2) stories or thirty (30) feet, whichever is
least, except as herein provided.
a3
1.3
August 18, 1981
Ramsey County
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
167 Courthouse
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
(612) 298 -4127
The Honorable Raymond Hanson
Mayor, City of Little Canada
515 East Little Canada Road
Little Canada, Minnesota 55117
Demont Avenue
KENNETH E. WELTZIN
Director
and
County Engineer
PHYLLIS F. SPECKER
Administrative Assistant
The proposed development in Little Canada in the Demont Avenue corridor
has caused a certain amount of concern by our department, which I
indicated to you when we talked by phone last week. I asked my staff
to review the status of Demont Avenue, and their findings are that
the functional classification of Demont Avenue is a local road primarily
serving the residents in that area. We believe that roads that do not
perform a County function, as most local roads do not, are more appro-
priately administered by the municipality. After reviewing the staff
report, it is my desire to turn this roadway over to the City of Little
Canada, and I am hereby requesting your acceptance. Once you have
indicated your willingness to accept this roadway, we will request the
County Board to revoke the county road designation.
_4.--emWrtejS-
Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E.
Director and County Engineer
kew:js
Att: Kirkwold Report, 8/14/81
CC: Commissioner Robert J. Orth
Board of Ramsey County Commissioners
14
G
INTRODUCTION
Within the past four years, three roads in the City of Little Canada have, by mutual=
agreement of the city and county, been removed from county jurisdiction. The juris-
dictional exchange of these roads, Jackson Street, Lakeshore Drive and County Road C,
was prompted by the decreasing importance of the roads in the county transportation
system. Ramsey County has also examined the need for Demont Avenue in the City of
Little Canada to remain under the county's jurisdiction.
DESCRIPTION
Demont Avenue (County Road 110) from Rice Street (T.H. 49) to Viking Drive is located
in the city of Little Canada (see Project Location Map, Figure 1). This .75 mile
section of bituminous roadway is 20 feet in width with gravel shoulders. The right
of way width is 66 feet.
Within the area bounded by T.N. 36, County Road C, Rice Street and I -35E, there are
two roads under county jurisdiction which are functionally classified as local roads:
County Road B -2 and Demont Avenue (see Functional Classification Map, Figure 2).
Another road within this area, Viking Drive, is under the jurisdiction of the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, and is functionally classified as a local
road. Other roads within the area are under city jurisdiction.
The existing traffic volume for Demont Avenue is 1550 west of Jackson Street and
850 east of Jackson (see Traffic Volumes Illustration, Figure 2). For year 2000,
volumes on Demont are projected at 1800. ADT west of Jackson Street and 2100 ADT
east of Jackson Street.
1
15
0
LITTLE CANACA
- PIAI DP
t P
It PP ACE
LADORE AVE
c.
0
s
57
N A D; AU
w
a
IRAN 51T AVE.
LND
PRCLIECf-
ROSE LA
DL roar Ay(.
Ayt
SEXTANT AvE
RD
AVE
6PANDviC-
GRANDVIEW A
LOWER ST.
LOVEli. x
0
NESOTA
C
0
$AMEnVRS` OP. K
2
SANDHURST
Lop DOE
0
1205VPIK
Arr.
AVE.
MOURDSVIE w
SOPO,
Loke
BLVD
McCorron5 . n
Lake
rr r
2
cr
LAR RE TEU
FIGURE
DEMONT WE. (couNT( ISO) FROM RICE smEFr To yucn4G DRIv .
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
i6
$GALE t"A = 2.000'
v' ►FORTH
Land use within the vicinity of Demont Avenue is a mixture of commercial, public
and residential (see Land Use Map, Figure 3). The area is bisected by a Soo Line
railroad track. Commercial development is clustered along Rice Street and Little
Canada Road. There are multi - family residential areas along I -35E accessible by
Viking Drive, County Road B -2 and Demont Avenue. Two schools are located within
the area, Capitol View Middle School and Kellogg High School. Other land use is
single - family residential.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
There is overlap between local and collector functional classification and jurisdic-
tional classification. The County and cities both have collectors and locals under
their jurisdiction. Ramsey County Comprehensive Plan, 1980, recommends that roads
which are functionally classified as locals and are under county jurisdiction should
be reviewed for their contribution to county residents. The County believes that
roads which do not perform a county function, as most local roads do not, are more
appropriately administered by local (municipal)' jurisdictions. If Demont Road,
therefore, is appropriately classified as a local road which does not perform a function
within the county road network, a recommendation can be made that it should be
removed from the County's jurisdiction.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Demont Avenue is classified currently as a local road. According to the Metropolitan
Council's functional classification criteria, which Ramsey County's Comprehensive
Plan has adopted, local roads are within neighborhoods and collectors are on edges
or within neighborhoods. Collectors connect neighborhoods within and between sub-
regions. Locals connect blocks within neighborhoods. Collector spacing is recommended
at 0.25 to 1.0 miles and local spacing at one block.
2
17
COUNTY
COUNT`(
to
lil
DRE S ob.
•
0
LAN1n US-_ E
comMeRcIAL.
SINGLE FAMILY, RESIflMNTIM-
Q MULTI . FAMIt•-Y ?EStDEMZ'IQL
j,ue>uc - gC,yooL:
PiGUTSE 3
DEMoNY fid/E. fucs 6rResr' 1b vlKIN
LAND UsE MAP
NI ¢
18
SCAM I " =z000^
rro
The Ramsey County Comprehensive Plan recognized a need for a road to be classified
as a collector within the area bounded by T.H. 36, County Road C, Rice Street and
I -35E. A recommendation was made in the Plan that Demont Avenue be classified as a -
collector from Rice Street to Viking Drive. However, because of the land use along
County Road B -2 and the higher existing and projected traffic volumes on that street,
it would be more appropriate that Demont Avenue retain its local classification and
County Road B -2 be upgraded to a collector. Demont Avenue serves residential land
uses. There is no access to Kellogg School from Demont. The access to both Kellogg
and Capitol View Schools is from County Road B -2. Demont Avenue performs a function
more appropriate to the municipal, rather than the County, road system.
KD /ldt
8/17/81
1.'
3
1931 TRAFFIC VoL_oMFS AND
FUNCT1or3AL CLASSIFICATION
i ** FEDER,•.L- AID (NTEFLISTATE
_■ia INTER NI EDIAlC ARTERthL-
®,oroe M 1 t4op, AINTERt A L.
.m• ... UR AN CoLLECTOFN
Ennnsein.
L,ocA t_
SCALE' 1 '?_000'
FIGURE 2
DEMONT AVE-. icste srmeer -ro Vikat4G DRJVE
1951 'TRAFFIC VOL_1-1MES
FONCTION M_ CL_ASSIFI GAT) °NI
20
5C.ALE I''t000°
MINUTES
City Council
September 8, 1980
Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -9 -333 - ADOPTING AND APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 78 -18, AUDITORS IMPROVEMENT NO. 78 -6,
AUD. NO. 1809, D/P NO. 1809 WITH THE DELETION OF THE ASSESSMENT
FOR PARCEL #53- 00500- 100 -38 WHICH WAS INCLUDED IN ERROR AND
WITH THE DEFERRAL OF THE ASSESSMENT FOR PARCELS #53- 03700 - 150 -13,
1/53- 03700 - 130 -13, 1/53- 03700 - 010 -13, 1/53- 03700 - 030 -13, 1/53- 03700 - 470 -13,
1/53- 03700 - 460 -13, 1/53- 03700 - 450 -13, 1/53- 03700- 420 -13, 1/53- 03700 - 200 -13,
AND #53- 03700 - 140 -13 WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE DEFERRAL OF THE
ASSESSMENT FOR THE KUSH, LANE, MASSIE AND KRUEGER PROPERTIES
IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT THERE PRESENTLY IS A WATERMAIN
BUT NO WATER STUBS IN FRONT OF THESE PROPERTIES AND THAT THE
WATER STUBS WILL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE WATERMAIN
IS INSTALLED NORTHWARDS FROM WESTWINDS TO COUNTY ROAD D OR THAT
THE CITY FINDS IT FEASIBLE AND PRACTICAL TO INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION
OF THESE STUBS IN ANOTHER CITY WATER PROJECT AND AT THE TIME
THE STUBS ARE INSTALLED THEY WILL BE INSTALLED AT CITY COST, HOWEVER,
IF THESE PROPERTY OWNERS WISH CITY WATER BEFORE THAT TIME, THESE
STUBS WILL HAVE TO BE INSTALLED AT THE PROPERTY OWNERS EXPENSE
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Nadeau.
Ayes (5) Fahey, Nadeau, Hanson, Scalze, DeBace.
Nayes (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 6, Pages 216 and 217.
Dave Mr. Dave Frattalone appeared before the Council and asked the Council
Frattalone the status of the proposed assessment against his property. Mr. Frattalone
Assessment was informed that the assessment was levied against his property. However,
there was discussion about the agreement the City was to have made with
Mr. Frattalone to defer these assessments. The Engineer and the Attorney
will be checking their records to determine if such an agreement was made.
If such an agreement is found, the assessments will be deferred.
Mr. Mike Frattalone appeared before the Council. Mr. Frattalone stated
that he thinks he has been assessed twice for sewer on Allen and Desoto
Streets.
The Engineer stated that he will check this out and get back to Mr.
Frattalone.
Public
Hearing
Improvement
No. 78 -12
Improvement No. 78 -12 is the improvement by watermain of Brooks and
Arkwright.
There was no one present objecting to the assessments for Improvement
No. 78 -12.
01
Page -9-
RICHARD A. MOORE
8 WARREN HART
WILLIAM F. ORME
MARVIN J. PERTZIK
A. PATRICK LEIGHTON
FREDERICK J. PUTZIER
DAVID L. WHITE
HAROLD R. FOTSCH
ROBERT A. ALBRECHT
RONALD E. MARTELL
WILLIAM M. BEAOIE
DENTS L. STODDARD
BRUCE E. KIERNAT
LARRY A. HANSON
J. PATRICK PLUNKETT
JOHN M. HARENS
ROBERT G. DANIELSEN
TIMOTHY A. SULLIVAN
DAVID A. KASTELIC
BRIAN W. MULLINS
ELISSA G. MAUTNER
GREGORY M. BISTRAM
MOORE, COSTELLO & HART
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1400 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
55 EAST FIFTH STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 227 -7683
City Council of Little Canada
c/o Mr. Joseph Chlebeck, City Clerk
515 East Little Canada Road
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55117
Dear Mr. Chlebeck:
FORMERLY
FARICY, MOORE, COSTELLO & HART
ROLAND J. FARICY
1898 -1962
HARRY G. COSTELLO
RETIRED
WALTER V. DORLE
OF COUNSEL
1907 -1980
September 1, 1981
Re: Jasper Hammond
Thomas and Elaine Reid
Our office represents Mr. Jasper Hammond
and Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Reid. I am writing on their behalf to confirm posi-
tions outlined in a letter I received from Don Carley. A copy of that letter
is attached.
It is our understanding that the City
Council has agreed to accept drainage easements from Mr. Hammond in two loca-
tions extending north from County Road 32 and also over the pond.
It is our understanding that the City of
Little Canada, at its own expense, will excavate these various easements. We
further understand that any excavation in the easements falling within the
flood plain which is in the elevation from 859.0 to 863.6 will be credited
to Mr. Hammond and may be allocated by him to compensate for any fill in the
flood plain on his or the Reid's property. The compensating excavation may
be applied by Mr. Hammond to comply with the terms of any Ramsey - Washington
Metro Watershed District permit or any other permit, rule, regulation or ordin-
ance or other law providing for no net filling in the flood plain.
We also understand thatthe engineering
firm of Milner W. Carley and Associates, Inc. is preparing plans for a water -
main project on County Road B2 which will include the easement work described
above. Based on discussions with Mr. Carley, we believe that the completion
22
ErnUI
SEP 2 1961
CITY OF
LITTLE CANADA
September 1, 1981
Page Two
of those plans is imminent and that the work will commence before the end
of this year.
If this letter does not accurately sum-
marize the City's understanding of its agreement with Mr. Hammond or if the
City does not want Mr. Hammond to rely on Mr. Don Carley's representations
regarding this project, please inform me as soon as possible.
Very truly yours,
MOORE, COSTELLO & HART
r /-!
By
Timothy A. Sullivan
TAS:bd
Enc.
cc: J. C. Hammond
Tom and Elaine Reid
2 a
SSOCIATES, IN
Consulting Engineers — Land Surveyors
St PAUL SAUK CENTRE ST. CLOUD
Mr. Tim Sullivan
Moore, Costello & Hart
Attorneys at Law
NW Nat'l Bank Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Mr. Sullivan:
500 West Highway 96
St. Paul. Minnesota 55112
4843301
400 E. St. Germain St.
St. Cloud. Minnesota 56301
2517751
314 Oak Street
Sauk Centre. Minnesota 56378
3523664
August 4, 1981
We met with Mr. Bruce Foley regarding the Hammond property
on County Road B2 in Little Canada, Minnesota.
The City Council of Little Canada has agreed to accept
drainage easements in two locations extending north from
County Road B2 and also over the Pond.
The City will excavate the easements and portions of the Pond
in order to accomplish drainage throughout to Gervais Lake.
There is approximately 900 cubic yards of fill which was
recently placed on the Hammond lot.
After we have calculated the amount of soil excavated by the
City, Mr. Hammond will remove the balance so that the total removed
equals 900 cubic yards. We have recommended that this work be
done in conjunction with other construction work in the City.
On July 24th, the City Council ordered the construction of
watermain on County Road B2. Consequently, we are in the
process of preparing plans which will include the aforesaid
drainage easement work.
Yours truly,
MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Donald 0. Carley, P.E.
Vice President
DOC:bjw
24
er-soti
o aicc); Minnesota
,
Department of Transportation
� District 9
e 4,), 3485 Hadley Avenue North Box 2050
OFTik a -
North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
(612) 770.2311
August 25, 1981
Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck
City of Little Canada
515 Little Canada Road
Little Canada, Minnesota 55117
In reply please refer to: 319
C.S. 6214 (TH 49 at Demont Ave.)
Traffic Signal Request
Dear Mr. Chlebeck:
We have received your request for a traffic signal at Trunk Highway 49
and Demont Avenue. We will consider it and perform an engineering
study of the intersection to see if a traffic signal is justified.
We should have the results of the study in two or three weeks.
If you have any questions in the meantime, feel free to give us a call.
Sincerely,
Mark R. Wikelius, P.E.
District Traffic Engineer
or
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone 612- 296 -0359
August 24, 1981
Joseph G. Chlebeck
City Clerk
515 Little Canada Road
Little Canada, MN 55117
Re: Request for Railroad Grade Crossing Signals
at the Soo Line Railroad Crossing of South Owasso
Boulevard in the City of Little Canada.
Dear Mr. Chlebeck:
Your letter to the Department of Public Service has been forwarded to our
office for response. The Minnesota Department of Transportation was
given authority to handle grade crossing matters in November, 1976, when
the Department was established.
Under the Federal Highway Act of 1973, funds were appropriated for up-
grading warning devices at grade crossings with federal funds paying 90%
of the cost and the local road authority (City) assuming the remaining 10 %.
A review of the crossing by this office has determined that it does not
qualify for this program at this time.
If the City of Little Canada wishes to pursue the matter further, the City
Council should pass a resolution requesting the Commissioner of Transporta-
tion to conduct a public hearing to determine if additional warning devices
are required for the crossing and to allocate the costs thereof.
There are limited State funds available to offset a portion of the costs
allocated to the public. However, 25 to 100% of the costs could be
allocated to the City of Little. Canada. Modern automatic signal systems
cost in the area of 60 to 90 thousand dollars.
If we can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact this
office.
Sincerely,
Robert G. Swanson
Manager, Railroad Operations
By: Ronald F. Mattson
RGS:RFM:pmt
26
An Equal Opportunity Employer
OFFICE OF THE LAND COMMISSIONER
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
109 Court House
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
55102
ANTHONY J. REITER, Commissioner
August 21, 1981
Raymond Hanson, Mayor
City of Little Canada
515 East Little Canada Road
Little Canada, MN 55117
RE: Belland Addition
Lot 6, Block 1
Dear Mr. Hanson:
In reviewing our files, we find that the above parcel was withheld from
sale for City use. It now appears this parcel is needed for the construct-
ion of a hiking or multi - purpose trail system per letter dated August 3,
1981, from Carl Spooner, Chairman, Little Canada Park Commission. We
request that the City of Little Canada acquire said land.
For your convenience, we are enclosing an application for Conveyance of
Tax Forfeited Lands. Please have it signed and notarized as indicated by
red checks and return the original and one copy to the Office of the Land
Couuuissioner, Room 109, Court House, St. Paul, MN 55102. Also, submit a
certified copy of a resolution by your City Council approving said appli-
cation. Enclosed is a sample resolution.
292-7087
In order that our files may be closed, we request that you submit said app-
lication to our office by October 1, 1981. When the application and resolut-
ion are returned, we will submit this matter to the Ramsey County Board of
Commissioners for its determination.
GEE /kt
enc. Application (3)
Resolution (1)
cc: Carl Spooner
Yours very truly,
ANTHONY J. REITER
Land Commissioner
-09)(D
27
tin. Reg. Meeting
:ity Council
)ct. 9, 1974
:ant.
WILDING
M. VEILLEUX
At Bore
:on t.
:'ax
, orfeited
.ands.
;534-
That permission is hereby granted to
Mrs Louis Le Bore to construct a
garage on Lot " F " of registered
Land survey no. 148 provided that
said garage is constructed pursuant
to the municipal building code and
set back regulations.
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Veilleux
The following voted infavor thereof;
Messrs: De Bate, Veilleux, Hanson, Rudy and Valento.
Against the same, no ne. Resolution adopted.
The clerk recieved a list of tax forfeited lands, from
the Land Commissioner.
and
his
Mr. Veilleux introduced the following motion
and moved its adoption.
The list of tax forteited lands is hereby
referred to the engineer and attorney for
study.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Hanson.
The Engineer stated that he was aware of the proposal
the city could act on the matter.
Mr. Veilleux rescinded his motion and Air. Hanson rescinded
second
The engineer indicated on the section maps that all
the parcels are an easment of some sort. They are all of use
to the City of Little Canada.
Mr. Valento introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption.
Whereas;
A RESOLUTION CLASSIFYING
TAX FORFEITED LANDS AS
CONSERVATION LANDS AND NONE
SALEABLE.
A notice has been sent from the
Tax Accounting Section, of Ramsey County
Department of taxation, indicating that
the following parcels are tax ofrfeited.
53- 00600 - 110 -16, 53- 13700- 060 -01 and
53- 54210- 011 -02. And-
page 11
2g-
w
Min. Reg Meeting
City Council
Oct. 9, 1974
Cont.
Tax
Forfeited
Cont.
(534 -552)
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OFLITTLE CANADA
That the classification of the land
indicated on the notice be classified
as conservation land and the sale thereof
be not approved, in order that they may be
acquired by the City of Little Canada.
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Rudy.
The following voted infavor thereof.
Messrs: Valento, Rudy, Hasnon, De Bace and Veilleux.
Against the same. None. Resolution adopted.
Landscape Mr. Veilleux mentioned that he and Mr. De Bate
Plan meet with the representatives of Data Bldg,
Data
Building Mr. De Bace introduced the following motion
(552- 554) and moved its adoption.
The Building Dept. in hereby instructed
to send a letter to the Data Co. inform-
ing them that no occupancy permit will
be issued until they comply with their
landscaping plans as approved on Sept.
25, 1974.
The foregoing motion was seconded by Mr. Valento.
Ayes, all motion carried.
MAINTENANCE
MR, DE RACE.
Gard Rail
(555- 558)
Mr. De Bace informed the Council that Mr.
Robert Paul, of 303 Little Canada Rd, has requested the County
to install guard rails on the cornor of his property.
Mr. De Bace introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption.
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING
THE COUNTY TO INSTALL
GUARD RAILS,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LITTLE
CANADA
page 12
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Dff ice of
IOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk
515 Little Canada Road
_ittle Canada, Minn. 55117
184 -2177
Mr. Larry M. Neumann
2540 Edgerton
Little Canada, MN 55117
May 5, 1981
RE: Assessment for Watermain 78 -10, Aud. D.P. luus
Dear Mr. Neumann:
Regretfully I must inform you it appears that the assessment
for Improvement No. 78 -10 did not appear on your 1980 taxes. The
mix -up was caused by an error in Property I. D. Nos. The assess-
ment rolls came out with one number and the property tax listing
came out with another number, and it did not appear on your taxes.
Therefore the assessment payment due in 1981 will be recom-
puted for the 1981 taxes collected in 1982. Your payment schedule
will not be for fifteen years but for 14 years, commencing with
the 1981 taxes collectable in 1982.
'I am also sending a copy of this letter to Mr. Gilbert. It
may be possible in the selling of the home an escrow fund was
established for the assessment.
The balance for the assessment as of this date is $1,948.60.
You can pay this in full at the City Office of Little Canada with-
out interest. Y..am considering this as a deferred assessment at
the present time.
JC:bj
cc: Edward Gilbert
Yours sincerely,
�
i//�Jitt%�
Josep G. Chlebeck
Clerk
City of Little Canada
30
MAYOR
Raymond Henson
COUNCI L
Michael Fahey
Beverly Sc•I[a
Dennis Forsberp
Mugs Nardini